Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix typo in additionalVolume struct #933

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Apr 27, 2020

Conversation

siku4
Copy link
Contributor

@siku4 siku4 commented Apr 24, 2020

related to PR #736:

It is not possible to specify a volumeSource based on the given cluster manifests examples and the documentation: The name of the json field within the AdditionalVolume struct is volume. The name specified in the CRD is volumeSource:

required:
- name
- mountPath
- volumeSource

@FxKu
Copy link
Member

FxKu commented Apr 24, 2020

Ah, good catch. Unfortunately, I can see that the multi_namespace tests is failing, which uses the complete manifest. Probably because the mentioned configmap and PVC do not exists.

@siku4 can you comment out the first two examples for additionalVolumes? And then maybe move the emptyDir volume to the top. I think that one should work.

@siku4 siku4 force-pushed the fix-typo-in-additionalVolume-struct branch 2 times, most recently from c776c94 to 94da000 Compare April 27, 2020 07:30
@siku4 siku4 force-pushed the fix-typo-in-additionalVolume-struct branch from 94da000 to 29acb67 Compare April 27, 2020 08:47
@FxKu
Copy link
Member

FxKu commented Apr 27, 2020

👍

@sdudoladov sdudoladov added this to the 1.5 milestone Apr 27, 2020
@sdudoladov sdudoladov added the bug label Apr 27, 2020
@sdudoladov
Copy link
Member

👍

@sdudoladov sdudoladov merged commit f32c615 into zalando:master Apr 27, 2020
@sdudoladov
Copy link
Member

@siku4 welcome to our community and thanks for the contribution !

@siku4 siku4 deleted the fix-typo-in-additionalVolume-struct branch April 27, 2020 10:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants