New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
SLA fails to set close_in_min and close_diff_in_min #2579
Comments
Update: This also affects first response in min :x |
You can also reproduce it this way:
Check the record via the Rails console: Ticket.last.close_in_min
=> nil |
Friendly reminder, this bug is still a thing. I would love to hear more details. |
Please have a look at the milestone, it says 3.6~ |
Hello there! Is there any update on this? We recently move to zammad (great software by the way) and we are trying to get some metrics and as you can imagine, this is affecting us. Thanks for all the effort in build this amazing tool |
Hi @rogedelgado We're internally testing a fix for this issue. It'll probably make it to the next release in late January/early February. |
Hi @mantas, good news indeed! We look forward for the new release! |
Hello there! Are there any updates? Thanks! :-) |
Hi! Having the same issues with the most recent Zammad version. |
Please don't hijack old issues. Open new issues if you're sure that it is a bug and not a technical question. |
Infos:
Expected behavior:
When enabling solution time within a SLA, Zammad will calculate the values
close_in_min
andclose_diff_in_min
during closing a ticket.Actual behavior:
With solution time enabled, Zammad will not set
close_in_min
andclose_diff_in_min
values, no matter on how long you wait or in what constellation you set the SLA configuration. This causesclose_diff_in_min
to be never set.Further notes:
close_in_min
should always be set on closing, especially when using SLA in my opinion. Probably affected line:zammad/app/models/ticket/escalation.rb
Line 224 in 160b521
Steps to reproduce the behavior:
² It does not matter if you close the ticket without any note, an internal note or even a mail. The result is always the same.
Yes I'm sure this is a bug and no feature request or a general question.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: