Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Fix typo newly found by codespell #1554

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 31, 2023
Merged

Fix typo newly found by codespell #1554

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion docs/tutorial.rst
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -1315,7 +1315,7 @@ better performance, at least when using the Blosc compression library.

The optimal chunk shape will depend on how you want to access the data. E.g.,
for a 2-dimensional array, if you only ever take slices along the first
dimension, then chunk across the second dimenson. If you know you want to chunk
dimension, then chunk across the second dimension. If you know you want to chunk
across an entire dimension you can use ``None`` or ``-1`` within the ``chunks``
argument, e.g.::

Expand Down