Add JSDoc syntax highlighting support

[rpfaeffle]

Closes #4926

Release Notes:

• Added support for JSDoc syntax highlighting (#7224).

[d1y]

Wow, Thank you

And, can you impl the regex match: https://github.com/tree-sitter/tree-sitter-javascript/blob/master/queries/injections.scm#L15-L18

[rpfaeffle]

I could definitely implement that. But I would create another PR for this feature, because I think those are two different features, especially since the syntax highlighting for regex could be beneficial for multiple languages and not only JS and TS.

[d1y]

I could definitely implement that. But I would create another PR for this feature, because I think those are two different features, especially since the syntax highlighting for regex could be beneficial for multiple languages and not only JS and TS.

Yep. I'm in favor of implementing it in other PRs. and I think maybe could also help (also in another PR) to implement comment highlighting: zed-industries/extensions#523

I think this tree-sitter-comment is at least the so-called global enablement regardless of any language

tree-sitter: https://github.com/stsewd/tree-sitter-comment

Two different scm to reference:

• helix-editor: https://github.com/helix-editor/helix/blob/59369d99e2ed891206bd63c9b83b034da474920a/runtime/queries/comment/highlights.scm
• neovim: https://github.com/nvim-treesitter/nvim-treesitter/blob/master/queries/comment/highlights.scm

Thank you~

[rpfaeffle]

@SomeoneToIgnore @maxbrunsfeld @JosephTLyons

If there is an interest in implementing something like that with the use of tree-sitter, I would be happy to help.

[d1y]

Are there any issues with this PR now? Can it be merged now?

[ConradIrwin]

@rpfaeffle similar to the other one, it seems worth merging this as it improves javascript (which I think will remain "in-core" for a while). Would you mind rebasing on main when you get some time?

[rpfaeffle]

@ConradIrwin I did a rebase of the PR. Should be good to merge.

[ConradIrwin]

Thanks!