You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Suggesting that you might relicense this project under MIT or BSD or Public Domain.
Many cryptographic libraries are licensed as such (e.g., secp256k1, libsnark, nacl, etc).
This makes it easier to include them in a diverse set of projects, and is more likely to get attention from outside contributors.
GPL is a fine license and has many benefits, so I understand the desire to use it, but for crypto libraries something more permissive is probably appropriate.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Suggesting that you might relicense this project under MIT or BSD or Public Domain.
Many cryptographic libraries are licensed as such (e.g., secp256k1, libsnark, nacl, etc).
This makes it easier to include them in a diverse set of projects, and is more likely to get attention from outside contributors.
GPL is a fine license and has many benefits, so I understand the desire to use it, but for crypto libraries something more permissive is probably appropriate.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: