Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Detect project ID mismatch in GCP service connector SA credentials #2708

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

stefannica
Copy link
Contributor

@stefannica stefannica commented May 15, 2024

Describe changes

GCP service accounts are scoped to a GCP project and cannot be used to gain access to resources from another project. When GCP SA credentials from a project are used with a ZenML GCP service connector configured to use another GCP project, unexpected and difficult to debug errors can occur.

This PR adds some logic to validate and report this configuration mismatch.

Pre-requisites

Please ensure you have done the following:

  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING.md document.
  • If my change requires a change to docs, I have updated the documentation accordingly.
  • I have added tests to cover my changes.
  • I have based my new branch on develop and the open PR is targeting develop. If your branch wasn't based on develop read Contribution guide on rebasing branch to develop.
  • If my changes require changes to the dashboard, these changes are communicated/requested.

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Other (add details above)

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented May 15, 2024

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on this repository.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot added internal To filter out internal PRs and issues bug Something isn't working labels May 15, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@htahir1 htahir1 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for this but but two points:

  • Are we sure there is not occasions where a service account for one project is given access to other projects (I am not aware of any but just want to make sure)
  • If the project is always in cfg.service_account_json and it always has to be the same as what the user says, then why do we ask the user to input it in the first place? Why cant we just take it from there?
  • As mentioned internally, please do add more logs around establishing a connection to debug what happens

@stefannica
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks for this but but two points:

  • Are we sure there is not occasions where a service account for one project is given access to other projects (I am not aware of any but just want to make sure)

Yes, 100% sure. This is a misconfiguration and should be avoided.

  • If the project is always in cfg.service_account_json and it always has to be the same as what the user says, then why do we ask the user to input it in the first place? Why cant we just take it from there?

This is a fair question. I'll look into it.

  • As mentioned internally, please do add more logs around establishing a connection to debug what happens

Unfortunately, the connection establishment is located deep inside the GCP Cloud Python library where I have no granular control, but I'll try to enable more verbose logs for those libraries overall.

@htahir1
Copy link
Contributor

htahir1 commented Jun 5, 2024

@stefannica feel free to merge this and make a follow up ticket for the rest of the work here ahead of the release tomorrow

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working internal To filter out internal PRs and issues run-slow-ci
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants