Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: relation fields are included even if they are set false in select clause #1429

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 10, 2024

Conversation

ymc9
Copy link
Member

@ymc9 ymc9 commented May 10, 2024

Fixes #1427

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented May 10, 2024

Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The recent updates involve enhancements in the policy utility class to optimize query processing, correction of a typo in an error message within the expression validator, and the introduction of a regression test to address a discrepancy in data querying with relation fields. These changes aim to refine functionality and ensure consistency in data handling across different components of the software.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
.../runtime/src/enhancements/policy/policy-utils.ts Added condition to skip processing if injectTarget[field] is false.
.../schema/src/language-server/validator/expression-validator.ts Corrected typo in error message regarding unresolved auth() function.
tests/regression/tests/issue-1427.test.ts Introduced a test case for issue #1427, focusing on a regression scenario involving data manipulation.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Exclude fields with false or undefined values in query results (Issue #1427) The changes suggest an approach to skip processing, but it's unclear if this directly resolves the issue as described. Further inspection of how injectTarget[field] is used in queries is needed.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

Note: Auto-reply has been disabled for this repository by the repository owner. The CodeRabbit bot will not respond to your replies unless it is explicitly tagged.

  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review Details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between cb50826 and a90435d.
Files selected for processing (3)
  • packages/runtime/src/enhancements/policy/policy-utils.ts (1 hunks)
  • packages/schema/src/language-server/validator/expression-validator.ts (1 hunks)
  • tests/regression/tests/issue-1427.test.ts (1 hunks)
Files not reviewed due to errors (1)
  • packages/runtime/src/enhancements/policy/policy-utils.ts (no review received)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • packages/schema/src/language-server/validator/expression-validator.ts
Additional comments not posted (1)
tests/regression/tests/issue-1427.test.ts (1)

3-42: The test case is well-structured and effectively tests the exclusion of fields set to false in the select clause, as described in the PR objectives.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review Details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between a90435d and d8c499e.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • packages/schema/tests/schema/validation/attribute-validation.test.ts (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • packages/schema/tests/schema/validation/attribute-validation.test.ts

@ymc9 ymc9 merged commit 6a71742 into dev May 10, 2024
13 checks passed
@ymc9 ymc9 deleted the fix/issue-1427 branch May 10, 2024 15:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant