Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Lack of POSIX compliance for sched_param struct #13470

Closed
SteveOss opened this issue Feb 18, 2019 · 1 comment
Closed

Lack of POSIX compliance for sched_param struct #13470

SteveOss opened this issue Feb 18, 2019 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
area: POSIX POSIX API Library bug The issue is a bug, or the PR is fixing a bug priority: low Low impact/importance bug

Comments

@SteveOss
Copy link

struct sched_param in Zephyr has a field named "priority", according to the POSIX specification
this field should be named "sched_priority". Is defined in include/posix/posix_sched.h

@SteveOss SteveOss added the bug The issue is a bug, or the PR is fixing a bug label Feb 18, 2019
@aescolar aescolar added the area: POSIX POSIX API Library label Feb 18, 2019
@pfalcon
Copy link
Contributor

pfalcon commented Feb 18, 2019

Will look into this as time permits, in the meantime also assigning @nniranjhana and @ramakrishnapallala who likely were the original authors of this code, to see if they might get earlier to it.

@nashif nashif added the priority: low Low impact/importance bug label Feb 18, 2019
nashif added a commit to nashif/zephyr that referenced this issue Feb 18, 2019
Priority member in the sched_param struct should be named
sched_priority.

Fixes zephyrproject-rtos#13470

Signed-off-by: Anas Nashif <anas.nashif@intel.com>
@nashif nashif assigned nashif and unassigned pfalcon Feb 18, 2019
nashif added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 19, 2019
Priority member in the sched_param struct should be named
sched_priority.

Fixes #13470

Signed-off-by: Anas Nashif <anas.nashif@intel.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area: POSIX POSIX API Library bug The issue is a bug, or the PR is fixing a bug priority: low Low impact/importance bug
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants