Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[Coverity CID :203502]Error handling issues in /tests/bluetooth/tester/src/gap.c #18432

Closed
aasthagr opened this issue Aug 17, 2019 · 2 comments
Closed

[Coverity CID :203502]Error handling issues in /tests/bluetooth/tester/src/gap.c #18432

aasthagr opened this issue Aug 17, 2019 · 2 comments
Assignees
@jhedberg
Labels
area: Bluetooth area: Tests Issues related to a particular existing or missing test bug The issue is a bug, or the PR is fixing a bug Coverity A Coverity detected issue or its fix priority: low Low impact/importance bug

Comments

@aasthagr
Copy link
Collaborator

Static code scan issues seen in File: /tests/bluetooth/tester/src/gap.c
Category: Error handling issues
Function: le_connected
Component: Tests
CID: 203502
Please fix or provide comments to square it off in coverity in the link: https://scan9.coverity.com/reports.htm#v32951/p12996
@aasthagr aasthagr added area: Tests Issues related to a particular existing or missing test bug The issue is a bug, or the PR is fixing a bug Coverity A Coverity detected issue or its fix labels Aug 17, 2019
@galak galak added the priority: low Low impact/importance bug label Aug 18, 2019
@aescolar
Copy link
Member

@jhedberg

@jhedberg
Copy link
Member

Marked as false-positive in Coverity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@jhedberg jhedberg

Labels
area: Bluetooth area: Tests Issues related to a particular existing or missing test bug The issue is a bug, or the PR is fixing a bug Coverity A Coverity detected issue or its fix priority: low Low impact/importance bug
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
4 participants
@jhedberg @galak @aescolar @aasthagr