NRF5340 PA/LNA support

[binkboyd]

Describe the bug
When enabling PA/LNA pin control the build fails with what appears to be both GPIO and PPID related errors. It doesn't look like the NRF53 PA/LNA code is implemented yet.

To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:
1)
add following to hci_rpmsg sample prj.conf, using the
CONFIG_BT_CTLR=y
CONFIG_BT_CTLR_GPIO_PA=y
CONFIG_BT_CTLR_GPIO_PA_PIN=29
CONFIG_BT_CTLR_GPIO_LNA=y
CONFIG_BT_CTLR_GPIO_LNA_PIN=24

west build samples/bluetooth/hci_rpmsg -b nrf5340_dk_nrf5340_cpunet
3)
Fails with lots of error, but seems to be both GPIO and ppi related:
...error: 'NRF_GPIO' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'NRF_GPIOTE'?
#define NRF_GPIO_PA NRF_GPIO

...warning: implicit declaration of function 'hal_enable_palna_ppi_config'; did you mean 'hal_trigger_aar_ppi_config'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]

...error: 'HAL_ENABLE_PALNA_PPI' undeclared

Expected behavior
Expected the sample to build and PA/LNA control to work.

Impact
My board is not useable as I have an external amplifier which cannot be controlled by the NRF5340.

Environment (please complete the following information):

• Latest NCS, so not up to date zephyr - but the affected file (radio.c) is the same as in latest zephyr master (7ba5e01)

[carlescufi]

@anangl would you please take a look at this? It's a matter of porting the PPI to DPPI

[ioannisg]

Is this really a bug @carlescufi ? PA/LNA support has not been ported yet to nRF5340, so AFAIU, it has never worked, so the ticket should be labeled as feature/enhancement

[carlescufi]

Yep, agreed @ioannisg. Let's relabel this as hardware support

[github-actions]

This issue has been marked as stale because it has been open (more than) 60 days with no activity. Remove the stale label or add a comment saying that you would like to have the label removed otherwise this issue will automatically be closed in 14 days. Note, that you can always re-open a closed issue at any time.

[github-actions]

This issue has been marked as stale because it has been open (more than) 60 days with no activity. Remove the stale label or add a comment saying that you would like to have the label removed otherwise this issue will automatically be closed in 14 days. Note, that you can always re-open a closed issue at any time.

[SloMusti]

I have the same issue and would like to use this functionality.

[cvinayak]

@binkboyd and @SloMusti

Please try using #30950 and leave your comments here or in the PR.

Add the following to your application core MCU program, to permit the GPIO to be controlled by network core MCU.

	NRF_P0->PIN_CNF[29] =
		GPIO_PIN_CNF_MCUSEL_NetworkMCU << GPIO_PIN_CNF_MCUSEL_Pos;
	NRF_P0->PIN_CNF[24] =
		GPIO_PIN_CNF_MCUSEL_NetworkMCU << GPIO_PIN_CNF_MCUSEL_Pos;

[github-actions]

This issue has been marked as stale because it has been open (more than) 60 days with no activity. Remove the stale label or add a comment saying that you would like to have the label removed otherwise this issue will automatically be closed in 14 days. Note, that you can always re-open a closed issue at any time.