Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Zephyr 3.2 module updates overview #49678

Closed
43 of 51 tasks
fabiobaltieri opened this issue Aug 30, 2022 · 13 comments
Closed
43 of 51 tasks

Zephyr 3.2 module updates overview #49678

fabiobaltieri opened this issue Aug 30, 2022 · 13 comments
Assignees
Labels
Meta A collection of features, enhancements or bugs
Milestone

Comments

@fabiobaltieri
Copy link
Member

fabiobaltieri commented Aug 30, 2022

Umbrella issue for tracking requests for updating various modules before Zephyr 3.2, listing all modules and an overview of the status compared to the correseponding upstream. Checkbox tick for modules where don't need extra work for 3.2 (up to date or no plan/need for an update for this release).

@fabiobaltieri fabiobaltieri added the Meta A collection of features, enhancements or bugs label Aug 30, 2022
@fabiobaltieri fabiobaltieri self-assigned this Aug 30, 2022
@henrikbrixandersen
Copy link
Member

We are tracking upstream v1.3-master (https://github.com/CANopenNode/CANopenNode/commits/v1.3-master) and as such we are up-to-date (except a couple of commits which breaks the upstream API).

@stephanosio
Copy link
Member

[ ] cmsis

There is already an issue open for this:
#45279

Unfortunately, it does not look like it will be done for 3.2.

@fabiobaltieri fabiobaltieri added this to the v3.2.0 milestone Aug 31, 2022
@fabiobaltieri
Copy link
Member Author

fabiobaltieri commented Aug 31, 2022

@yperess @nashif @nandojve @sylvioalves @glaubermaroto @uLipe @MulinChao @ChiHuaL @WealianLiao @kowalewskijan @yonsch @yonsch @mnkp @chrta @cfriedt @gmarull @dcpleung @brgl @Navin-Sankar @d3zd3z @ceolin @nordic-krch @laurenmurphyx64 @tleksell-pe @microbuilder @rlubos

Hi! If you are listed here you are a maintainer for a Zephyr module that has updates available upstream. The merge window closes on September 9th, does your module needs an update? Feel free to tick the corresponding item, add a comment, open an issue, a PR or whatever suits.

Thanks!

@yperess
Copy link
Collaborator

yperess commented Aug 31, 2022

@fabiobaltieri fff's commit is just a restructure of the directory and CI, there's another on the way which I hope to merge shortly. That last one will actually change the header and I'll pull both at the same time.

@chrta
Copy link
Collaborator

chrta commented Aug 31, 2022

I do not plan to update the sdk. The version information (that the currently used version is 3.1.0) is correct. See also #43139

@nandojve
Copy link
Member

Hi @fabiobaltieri ,

hal_atmel (@nandojve)
current version unclear, latest v3.52.0

hal_atmel did not track ASF versions. The hal_atmel only have registers files and are added/updated based on http://packs.download.atmel.com. I think there won`t be any new activity for v3.2.

hal_gigadevice is usually tracked by @gmarull and me and I believe there is no pending things till moment.

@dcpleung
Copy link
Member

upstream of hal_xtensa is https://github.com/foss-xtensa/xtensa-hal, which has no update.

@sylvioalves
Copy link
Collaborator

sylvioalves commented Aug 31, 2022

@fabiobaltieri, hal_espressif will be updated to v4.4.1 with this PR: #49682

@ChiHuaL
Copy link
Contributor

ChiHuaL commented Sep 1, 2022

Actually, We (@MulinChao and @ChiHuaL) are not maintainers for the HAL.
We maintain Nuvoton EC series chip (NPCX series) and put everything in the Zephyr repository based on the disscussion here. We didn't use the hal for EC chip.

The Hal part is used for general MCU chips (Numicro) in Nuvoton.
The hal maintainer should be @ssekar15.

@ssekar15
Copy link
Collaborator

ssekar15 commented Sep 1, 2022

hal_nuvoton (@MulinChao @ChiHuaL @WealianLiao)
never been updated, upstream has recent commits
https://github.com/OpenNuvoton/M480BSP

@fabiobaltieri
I will do it

fabiobaltieri added a commit to fabiobaltieri/zephyr that referenced this issue Sep 2, 2022
The nuvoton HAL module is for the Numicro platform, not NPCX. Update the
list of maintainers accordingly.

Link: zephyrproject-rtos#49678 (comment)
Signed-off-by: Fabio Baltieri <fabiobaltieri@google.com>
fabiobaltieri added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 5, 2022
The nuvoton HAL module is for the Numicro platform, not NPCX. Update the
list of maintainers accordingly.

Link: #49678 (comment)
Signed-off-by: Fabio Baltieri <fabiobaltieri@google.com>
@cfriedt
Copy link
Member

cfriedt commented Sep 5, 2022

There is no rush to update hal_ti right now. I am in discussion with 2 candidates (TI employees) who may be better as maintainers.

@yonsch
Copy link
Contributor

yonsch commented Sep 5, 2022

No need to update hal_rpi_pico for now

coreboot-org-bot pushed a commit to coreboot/zephyr-cros that referenced this issue Sep 8, 2022
The nuvoton HAL module is for the Numicro platform, not NPCX. Update the
list of maintainers accordingly.

(cherry picked from commit d215c26)

Original-Link: zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr#49678 (comment)
Original-Signed-off-by: Fabio Baltieri <fabiobaltieri@google.com>
GitOrigin-RevId: d215c26
Change-Id: I305c4d31aad14cf99234037c788117ae1f4ce764
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromiumos/third_party/zephyr/+/3882561
Tested-by: CopyBot Service Account <copybot.service@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Aaron Massey <aaronmassey@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Aaron Massey <aaronmassey@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Massey <aaronmassey@google.com>
@microbuilder
Copy link
Member

psa-arch-tests in Zephyr is tightly-coupled to the version of TF-M being used, so we won't pull upstream updates in until we also update TF-M, which will be post 3.2. Marked as done.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Meta A collection of features, enhancements or bugs
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests