Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Move monitoring functionality out of socket_t and into monitor_t #22

Merged
merged 7 commits into from Jul 16, 2013

Conversation

ricnewton
Copy link
Contributor

Some comments on these changes in pull request 21: #21

@guidog
Copy link

guidog commented Jun 28, 2013

As already said in the other thread:

In ØMQ 3.3 the notification messages consist of 2 parts.
Please see
http://api.zeromq.org/3-3:zmq-socket-monitor
for details.

… guaranteed to get monitor events after this point.

This is useful if you are spawning the monitor to a different thread and need to wait until monitor has started before opening the socket.
@ricnewton
Copy link
Contributor Author

Abort now implemented.

@cjuniet cjuniet mentioned this pull request Jul 4, 2013
@taurel
Copy link
Contributor

taurel commented Jul 16, 2013

Hello all

Is there any reason why we couldn't merge this PR?
If I understand correctly, we should close without merge PR 21 but we should merge this one. Is this correct?

Cheers

@ricnewton
Copy link
Contributor Author

Yes, that is correct.

Just waiting for a maintainer to merge it, there doesn't seem to be a particularly active one for this project.

@kobolog
Copy link
Member

kobolog commented Jul 16, 2013

Let's merge it then!

kobolog pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 16, 2013
Move monitoring functionality out of socket_t and into monitor_t
@kobolog kobolog merged commit f43e83e into zeromq:master Jul 16, 2013
@ricnewton
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks

@hintjens
Copy link
Member

@ricnewton I've pushed you up to committer, take a look at http://rfc.zeromq.org/spec:22 which is our process.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants