Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Possible to share the results file for THUMOS14 test? #32

Closed
zijunwei opened this issue Apr 10, 2018 · 2 comments
Closed

Possible to share the results file for THUMOS14 test? #32

zijunwei opened this issue Apr 10, 2018 · 2 comments

Comments

@zijunwei
Copy link

Hi, thanks for sharing the code!
We want to compare multiple action proposal algorithms and definitely your work is one of the bests. However, it is a little bit difficult to configure caffe and run it on our side. Is it possible for you to share us the output of your proposal results on THUMOS14 test set? something like: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B9WpeMTDrC3fdWJjajhuODZXS3c/view

@zhengshou
Copy link
Owner

Thank you for your interest in our work. I think you can find the needed information under https://github.com/zhengshou/scnn/tree/master/experiments/THUMOS14/network_proposal/result/

@zijunwei
Copy link
Author

Thanks!
I checked the both https://github.com/zhengshou/scnn/tree/master/experiments/THUMOS14/network_localization/result
and
https://github.com/zhengshou/scnn/tree/master/experiments/THUMOS14/network_proposal/result

But I'm not sure what exactly the columns do.
The information I have so far is:

save the format to csv following the previous

tmp = strsplit(videoname,'_');

seg_swin(end+1,1) = str2num(tmp{end});

seg_swin(end,2) = window_stride;

seg_swin(end,3) = start_frame;

seg_swin(end,4) = end_frame;

seg_swin(end,5) = start_frame/framerate;

seg_swin(end,6) = end_frame/framerate;

seg_swin(end,12) = 1-win_overlap_rate;

also the proposal confidence seems to be seg_swin(10).
But in the localization file, the score is changed to 0 and new scores on 9, 11 and 12 are shown.
What do they mean?
If I want to compare the temporal proposal performance, which result should I use?
Also, do I need to do NMS? clipping? Posterior prob multiplication based on their length?
I just want to make sure that the result we report is not degraded due to any processing missing.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants