New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
When "sending all private" use "MixUntilAnonimitySet" as benchmark (?) #1371
Comments
The settings that you are looking for are:
These settings control the shields as well as the selection behaviour in the coin list and can be changed in the config.json file. The setting that you mentioned is to let the client know when to stop mixing. I don't remember if there is another setting and i am writing in the phone. Anyway, take a look at the config file. Sent from my Moto G(4) using FastHub |
Maybe we should replace the mixuntilanonimityset that instead of it being an integer, it would be a I've done a backwards compatible, but not forwards compatible change a while ago and it was quite annoying to handle the issues and questions, because of my stupid change. |
Francis is saying that we should change the Select All Private coins function.
Wasabi should use the mix until level when selecting private coins. |
Yes that is what I mean, sorry for not being clear. I guess the underlying issue is what determines "private". Seems like within the project, the privacy level is almost strictly determined by the anonymity set (since everything else is pretty much private by default). May seem like not a big issue but we often have 50+ outputs that we consolidate post-coinjoin. It actually becomes easier to make a mistake by inserting a non-private output by manually having to selecf all the ones we consider private. |
I think I can solve this for myself by simply lowering the "privacylevelstrong" config, but perhaps there is some better system that can be thought of later. This is very low priority as far as I'm concerned. |
I'm not entirely certain (and this may have been fixed if there is an issue) but I noticed that the privacy check (the green checkmark) didn't appear on transactions that had an anonimity set of 11 while our default "mixuntilanonimityset" was 10. When selecting "send all private" it wouldnt select these UTXOs. Is it possible that the benchmark for determining if a utxo is private is always set to "strong?"
I think whatever the benchmark currently is, it should be set to the "mixuntilanonimityset" benchmark since we can safely assume that this is the default one the user wants to use.
Thanks for the consideration
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: