You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It seems that a CTCP NOTICE message to a channel, such as a KVIrc user changing their avatar, is treated the same as if it were a PRIVMSG, so ZNC is sending a configured response if there is one and not passing it on to the client. This seems to be erroneous: the NOTICE message should not be replied to automatically like this.
Once upon a time, this worked fine. This must be a regression that was introduced by the CMessage "stuff". This handles both PRIVMSG CTCPs and NOTICE CTCPs as being of type CTCP. I guess the right fix would be to introduce a CTCPReply type here...
It seems that a CTCP
NOTICE
message to a channel, such as a KVIrc user changing their avatar, is treated the same as if it were aPRIVMSG
, so ZNC is sending a configured response if there is one and not passing it on to the client. This seems to be erroneous: theNOTICE
message should not be replied to automatically like this.znc/src/IRCSock.cpp
Lines 428 to 434 in b52fecc
(For normal private CTCP messages, the following lines deal with
NOTICE
replies:)znc/src/IRCSock.cpp
Lines 420 to 422 in b52fecc
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: