-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
handle None value in field index #12
Merged
Merged
Changes from 5 commits
Commits
Show all changes
9 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
7f5dc0e
handle None value in field index
fgregg 7452965
line up mac os python builds with travis
fgregg d4c4517
indent
fgregg 83ab48d
allow None values
fgregg 3ba34a2
no macpython3.3
fgregg b1e8db3
use marker and set btree minimum requirement
fgregg 223c61a
remove debug
fgregg 13af105
add entry on None values in field index to CHANGES
fgregg 9e7d896
use up to date pip to use wheels and reduce build time
fgregg File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe use a marker value, to avoid doing both a
__contains__
and then a__getitem__
call?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not familiar enough with python interning rules to know how to do this in a completely safe way. Is there a part of the python spec that discusses this or is it something that can be different from implementation to implementation.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
As far as I know, there's nothing that's actually in the spec about this specifically.
(PyPy does exactly the opposite of this, BTW:
)
I think that "keeping a reference" thing is generally enough to be safe, though, so long as you avoid things that can be written literally like strings and numbers (typically one sees
object
). You can keep the_MARKER
at global module scope or if you want to be extra sure you can cons one up for every function invocation:There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would create the module-global
_MARKER
and use it as the default.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please do switch back to using
rev_index.get(docid, _MARKER)
.