-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 90
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Make sure the error is thrown and reported #296
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Colin Stone <30794003+Colin-Stone@users.noreply.github.com>
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #296 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 91.5% 91.22% -0.28%
==========================================
Files 15 15
Lines 2389 2098 -291
Branches 452 368 -84
==========================================
- Hits 2186 1914 -272
+ Misses 202 183 -19
Partials 1 1
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
Code coverage is still appearing a little wacky. The junit tests coverage is actually a little better as I have added one new line which is covered by testing. |
If we look at the history of the Should we submit an issue to @codecov? Notice how it tracks the empty line 1515 in the parent commit (f65b20b) and not the corresponding line 1516 in the current commit (073dbff) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for surfacing the error and adding the test : )
👍
Thanks for the review. Are we seeing similar codecov issues with cli?. I was going to ask if we need to create an example for them but I think they can see this so yes probably worth raising an issue |
Possibly related issue on codecov-batch: codecov/codecov-bash#83 |
Signed-off-by: Colin Stone 30794003+Colin-Stone@users.noreply.github.com
The error needs to be rethrown to be reported.