New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Genes in Lead_genes and heatmap are wrong when using gene_set permutation #190
Comments
This modification seems to work for the heatmap. |
zqfang
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Feb 7, 2023
zqfang
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Feb 7, 2023
Thank you very much for reporting this bug. I've changed the code to be more readable and maintainable to me. I'll release a bug fixed version ASAP |
zqfang
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Feb 7, 2023
v1.0.4 has been released to fix this issue |
Thanks for your prompt fix! I will try the new version. |
No problem at all! |
Thanks! It works! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Enriched terms seem fine. However, gene list in the resulting csv (Lead_genes) and heatmap are weird only when permutation_type = gene_set.
Obvious most of the leading edge genes are not related with mitotic cell cycle and do not exist in the gmt file.
When permutation_type = phenotype, I could see the right genes.
I'm using GSEApy v1.0.3.
Thank you for your great contribution and support.
K Lim
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: