We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Hi,
just would like to let you know, that with this commit: f397fae you introduced regression that wait with just time value is not precise enough.
wait
time
Before:
>> t: now/time/precise wait 0.001 now/time/precise - t == 0:00:00.001 >> t: now/time/precise wait 0.001 now/time/precise - t == 0:00:00.001 >> t: now/time/precise wait 0.002 now/time/precise - t == 0:00:00.002 >> t: now/time/precise wait 0.002 now/time/precise - t == 0:00:00.002
Now:
>> t: now/time/precise wait 0.001 now/time/precise - t == 0:00:00.002 >> t: now/time/precise wait 0.001 now/time/precise - t == 0:00:00.01 >> t: now/time/precise wait 0.001 now/time/precise - t == 0:00:00.01 >> t: now/time/precise wait 0.001 now/time/precise - t == 0:00:00.019 >> t: now/time/precise wait 0.002 now/time/precise - t == 0:00:00.014 >> t: now/time/precise wait 0.002 now/time/precise - t == 0:00:00.01
(tested on Windows)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
FIX: enable better wait precision for timeouts bellow 16ms
5e975ad
Fixes: zsx#42
No branches or pull requests
Hi,
just would like to let you know, that with this commit: f397fae
you introduced regression that
wait
with justtime
value is not precise enough.Before:
Now:
(tested on Windows)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: