You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
$ eget --asset=.tar.gz --system=linux/amd64 neovim/neovim
4 candidates found for asset .tar.gz
please selectmanually:
(1) nvim-linux64.tar.gz
(2) nvim-linux64.tar.gz.sha256sum
(3) nvim-macos.tar.gz
(4) nvim-macos.tar.gz.sha256sum
Enter selection number:
The above command and subsequently returned choices strikes me to believe that:
This is a bug in the processing of CLI flags that disregards previous flag
values and returns results that should have been filtered out.
ex. I specify criteria of .tar.gz assets for Linux, but eget returned darwin assets that don't satisfy criteria.
Happy to fix this, but wanted to get confirmation before doing needful.
Somewhat quirky behavior which I am guilty of glossing over when reading
through documentation. If this is the case, could you ELI5 the design choices
around parsing CLI arguments and another hypothetical scenario that explains
returned asset choices?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Can't grok logic for the returns asset choices
command in question
The above command and subsequently returned choices strikes me to believe that:
values and returns results that should have been filtered out.
ex. I specify criteria of
.tar.gz
assets forLinux
, buteget
returneddarwin
assets that don't satisfy criteria.Happy to fix this, but wanted to get confirmation before doing needful.
through documentation. If this is the case, could you ELI5 the design choices
around parsing CLI arguments and another hypothetical scenario that explains
returned asset choices?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: