-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 598
Fix PR Labeler #569
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Fix PR Labeler #569
Conversation
* fixed the `python` label being added to almost every PR for some reason
Dependency Review✅ No vulnerabilities or license issues or OpenSSF Scorecard issues found.Scanned FilesNone |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🤖 Code Review by Dume.ai, on behalf of @anmol098
Hello, this pull request has been reviewed by Dume.ai, the AI executive assistant to @anmol098.
Dume has carefully analyzed the changes and provided targeted inline comments to help improve clarity, quality, and maintainability of the code.
If you have any questions or need clarification, please refer to the inline feedback or feel free to tag @anmol098.
Review performed on 2025-06-09T04:49:56.972Z
—
Powered by Dume.ai – Your AI executive assistant for engineering workflows.
@@ -1,9 +1,10 @@ | |||
name: "Pull Request Labeler" | |||
name: Pull Request Labeler |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
💡 AI Review: - Code Quality: The change from "Pull Request Labeler"
to Pull Request Labeler
in the name
field improves readability by removing unnecessary quotes.
- Code Quality: Adding
name: Label PRs
to thelabeler
job provides a clearer description of the job's purpose in the workflow run. This enhances readability and maintainability. - Potential Issue: The workflow trigger is
pull_request_target
. Ensure this is the correct trigger for the intended use case.pull_request_target
allows the workflow to access the contents of the base branch, but also introduces security considerations as it runs in the context of the base branch. If the workflow doesn't need to modify the base branch, consider usingpull_request
instead.
@@ -14,10 +14,11 @@ documentation: | |||
github_actions: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
💡 AI Review: - Bug and Issue Identification: The original python
label configuration excluded sources/translation.json
. The new configuration only includes sources/**.py
, effectively dropping the exclusion. This might be unintentional, as changes to sources/translation.json
might still require a translation
label.
- Improvement Suggestion: The
python
section should be reviewed to ensure that it correctly identifies Python-related changes. Consider keeping the original configuration and adding.py
to the glob, or explicitly adding a rule fortranslation.json
if it should be labeled differently. - Code Quality: The addition of
.github/labeler.yml
to thegithub_actions
section is good for ensuring that changes to the labeler configuration itself are properly labeled.
Fixed the
python
label being added to almost every PR for some reason.