Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

common: recursive lock of md_config_t (0) #5814

Merged
1 commit merged into from Oct 20, 2015
Merged

Conversation

smithfarm
Copy link
Contributor

lockdep can't handle recursive locks, resulting in false positive
reports for certain set_val_or_die() calls, like via
md_config_t::parse_argv() passed "-m".

Fixes: ceph#12614
Signed-off-by: Josh Durgin <jdurgin@redhat.com>
(cherry picked from commit 4152269)
@smithfarm smithfarm self-assigned this Sep 4, 2015
@smithfarm smithfarm added this to the firefly milestone Sep 4, 2015
ghost pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 20, 2015
Reviewed-by: Loic Dachary <ldachary@redhat.com>
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Oct 20, 2015

@liewegas does this backport look good to merge ? It passed a run of the firefly rados suite ( see http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11644#note-110 ). Note that there was a valgrind issues but it is unrelated and fixed by #6325.

@liewegas
Copy link
Member

👍

ghost pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 20, 2015
recursive lock of md_config_t (0)

Reviewed-by: Sage Weil <sage@redhat.com>
@ghost ghost merged commit e43d049 into ceph:firefly Oct 20, 2015
@smithfarm smithfarm deleted the wip-12840-firefly branch October 20, 2015 19:45
@ghost ghost changed the title recursive lock of md_config_t (0) common: recursive lock of md_config_t (0) Oct 24, 2015
This pull request was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
4 participants