backporting sherpa2.2.6 and openloops2.0.0 to 71X

[SiewYan]

backporting sherpa2.2.6 and openloops2.0.0

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @SiewYan (SiewYan) for branch IB/CMSSW_7_1_X/stable.

@cmsbuild, @smuzaffar, @gudrutis, @mrodozov can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.

[SiewYan]

Hi, please apply the mentioned patches in [1] and [2] ,mentioned here [3]

[1] cms-externals/openloops@5141c0e
[2] https://gitlab.com/openloops/OpenLoops/commit/8ff8f52fe6e0f9f4f3f666b0d89279da64554fc3
[3] #4796

[cmsbuild]

Pull request #4821 was updated.

[cmsbuild]

Pull request #4821 was updated.

[cmsbuild]

Pull request #4821 was updated.

[cmsbuild]

Pull request #4821 was updated.

[SiewYan]

@mrodozov , could you please check the gitlab tag is correct and trigger the test?
Thanks.

[cmsbuild]

Pull request #4821 was updated.

[mrodozov]

please test

[cmsbuild]

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/34420/console

[cmsbuild]

-1

Tested at: 1109319

• Build:

I found compilation error when building:

result = func(*args)
File "/build/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/ib-any-integration/testBuildDir/slc6_amd64_gcc481/external/python/2.7.6/lib/python2.7/urllib2.py", line 1222:
return self.do_open(httplib.HTTPSConnection, req)
File "/build/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/ib-any-integration/testBuildDir/slc6_amd64_gcc481/external/python/2.7.6/lib/python2.7/urllib2.py", line 1184:
raise URLError(err)
error: Bad exit status from /build/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/ib-any-integration/testBuildDir/tmp/rpm-tmp.EYxZ08 (%build)


RPM build errors:
Bad exit status from /build/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/ib-any-integration/testBuildDir/tmp/rpm-tmp.EYxZ08 (%build)



You can see the results of the tests here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-4821/34420/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

Pull request #4821 was updated.

[mrodozov]

please test

[cmsbuild]

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/34471/console

[cmsbuild]

+1
Tested at: 172fca7
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-4821/34471/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-4821/34471/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

• No significant changes to the logs found
• Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 11
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 682535
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 3314
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 678847
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 374
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: -10 KiB( 10 files compared)
• Checked 44 log files, 4 edm output root files, 11 DQM output files

[smuzaffar]

thanks @mrodozov , can you please locally build it and compare the openloop install are to see if all the extra downloaded files are available there? Compare it with the slc7_amd64_gcc700 installation of openloops 2.0.0 on CVMFS to make sure this this workaround actually copied all the files.

[qliphy]

@smuzaffar #4823 is now merged. Would you please trigger test this PR and move forward? Thanks!

[mrodozov]

The installation on cvmfs has three folders, etc lib and proclib , all the files present in the 481 installation are also present in /cvmfs/cms-ib.cern.ch/week1/slc7_amd64_gcc700/external/openloops/2.0.0
the 481 installation is on cmsdev22
/build/mrodozov/build_sherpa_gcc4/build_openloops_localrepo/slc6_amd64_gcc481/external/openloops/2.0.0

[smuzaffar]

+externals
thanks @mrodozov . @fabiocos this is ready to go in 71X now.

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next IB/CMSSW_7_1_X/stable IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

[fabiocos]

+1