New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Back port geant4 10.7.1 changes from geant4_vecgeom #6742
Conversation
A new Pull Request was created by @smuzaffar (Malik Shahzad Muzaffar) for branch IB/CMSSW_11_3_X/master. @cmsbuild, @smuzaffar, @mrodozov can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. |
please test |
Pull request #6742 was updated. |
@smuzaffar do we need also https://github.com/cms-sw/cmsdist/compare/IB/CMSSW_11_3_X/geant4_vecgeom to be tested with this PR? |
@silviodonato , this PR includes recent versions of G4, vecgeom, and clhep, which should go together. As I understand, they were validated together by PPD. |
@smuzaffar @cms-sw/simulation-l2 |
-1 Failed Tests: Build BuildI found compilation error when building: @@@@ ----> OK EDM Class Transients >> Checking EDM Class Version for src/DataFormats/GeometryCommonDetAlgo/src/classes_def.xml in libDataFormatsGeometryCommonDetAlgo.so >> Checking EDM Class Version for src/DataFormats/GEMRecHit/src/classes_def.xml in libDataFormatsGEMRecHit.so @@@@ ----> OK EDM Class Transients >> Checking EDM Class Version for src/DataFormats/GsfTrackReco/src/classes_def.xml in libDataFormatsGsfTrackReco.so error: class 'CLHEP::Hep3Vector' has a different checksum for ClassVersion 10. Increment ClassVersion to 11 and assign it to checksum 3438801427 Suggestion: You can run 'scram build updateclassversion' to generate src/DataFormats/CLHEP/src/classes_def.xml.generated with updated ClassVersion gmake: *** [tmp/slc7_amd64_gcc900/edm_checks/libDataFormatsCLHEP.so] Error 1 >> Checking EDM Class Version for src/DataFormats/HGCalReco/src/classes_def.xml in libDataFormatsHGCalReco.so Error in : Dictionary trigger function for DataFormatsCLHEP_xr not found @@@@ ----> OK EDM Class Transients |
please test with cms-sw/cmssw#33231 |
I've closed cms-sw/cmssw#33231 and opened The test are running in cms-sw/cmssw#33234 |
-1 Failed Tests: UnitTests The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:
You can see more details here: Unit TestsI found errors in the following unit tests: ---> test TestIntegrationWaitingThread had ERRORS Comparison SummarySummary:
|
The test is ok cms-sw/cmssw#33234 (comment) |
please test with cms-sw/cmssw#33231 lets re-run tests based on a clean Ib |
please abort |
please test with cms-sw/cmssw#33234 |
+externals |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next IB/CMSSW_11_3_X/master IBs after it passes the integration tests. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-e988a2/13651/summary.html Comparison SummaryThe workflows 140.53 have different files in step1_dasquery.log than the ones found in the baseline. You may want to check and retrigger the tests if necessary. You can check it in the "files" directory in the results of the comparisons Summary:
|
+1 |
No description provided.