Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[vecgeom][gcc11] drop CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS_RELEASE to let veccgeom use its default flags #8028

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Aug 18, 2022

Conversation

smuzaffar
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @smuzaffar (Malik Shahzad Muzaffar) for branch IB/CMSSW_12_5_X/g11.

@cmsbuild, @smuzaffar, @aandvalenzuela, @iarspider can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy, @rappoccio you are the release manager for this.
cms-bot commands are listed here

@smuzaffar
Copy link
Contributor Author

FYI @hahnjo

@smuzaffar
Copy link
Contributor Author

please test
just to confirm that vecgeom is built with -O3

@smuzaffar
Copy link
Contributor Author

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #8028 was updated.

@smuzaffar
Copy link
Contributor Author

vecgeom build logs look good now.

-- Compiling with C++ flags:  -O3 -DNDEBUG  -Wall -fmax-errors=20 -ftree-vectorize -finline-limit=10000000 -fdiagnostics-color=auto  -faligned-new -msse3

@smuzaffar smuzaffar merged commit 88755d0 into IB/CMSSW_12_5_X/g11 Aug 18, 2022
@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-d09905/26908/summary.html
COMMIT: 1a9550e
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_5_X_2022-08-17-1100/el8_amd64_gcc11
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmsdist/8028/26908/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

There are some workflows for which there are errors in the baseline:
136.9 step 4
The results for the comparisons for these workflows could be incomplete
This means most likely that the IB is having errors in the relvals.The error does NOT come from this pull request

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 17661 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 51
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3692140
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 24410
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 4
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3667704
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 975.532 KiB( 50 files compared)
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 11634.0,... ): 108.078 KiB HLT/EXO
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 11634.0,... ): 54.512 KiB HLT/HIG
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 138.4,... ): -0.004 KiB JetMET/SUSYDQM
  • Checked 212 log files, 49 edm output root files, 51 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: found differences in 2 / 50 workflows

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants