Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

HIN Jet DQM module version 3 #12194

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

rkunnawa
Copy link
Contributor

This is the updated HIN Jet DQM module v3, containing some bug fixes and new additions based on the PR #12002 which contains the centrality bin. We checked the matrix with the aforementioned PR merged. Once the Heavy Ion come up with a 75X version of that #12002, we will request a back port into 75X.
Thanks!

…ions to DQMOffline/JetMET and Validation/RecoJets to check Jets with Heavy Ion reco
@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @rkunnawa (Raghav Kunnawalkam Elayavalli) for CMSSW_7_6_X.

HIN Jet DQM module version 3

It involves the following packages:

DQMOffline/JetMET
Validation/RecoJets

@cmsbuild, @danduggan, @vanbesien, @deguio can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@rappoccio, @ahinzmann, @mmarionncern, @jdolen, @nhanvtran, @schoef, @mariadalfonso, @TaiSakuma, @rociovilar this is something you requested to watch as well.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
If you are a L2 or a release manager you can ask for tests by saying 'please test' or '@cmsbuild, please test' in the first line of a comment.
@Degano you are the release manager for this.
You can merge this pull request by typing 'merge' in the first line of your comment.

@diguida
Copy link
Contributor

diguida commented Oct 30, 2015

please test

@diguida
Copy link
Contributor

diguida commented Oct 30, 2015

@rkunnawa @smdogra the 75X back-port of #12002 is ready, together with GT: #12213

@diguida
Copy link
Contributor

diguida commented Oct 30, 2015

@franzoni @mmusich

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/9390/console

@rkunnawa
Copy link
Contributor Author

@diguida, thanks for telling me about the backport. I will prepare a PR for that now. I will test it with merging the #12213.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@deguio
Copy link
Contributor

deguio commented Nov 2, 2015

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Nov 2, 2015

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/9419/console

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Nov 2, 2015

Pull request #12194 was updated. @cmsbuild, @danduggan, @vanbesien, @deguio can you please check and sign again.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Nov 2, 2015

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Nov 3, 2015

@rkunnawa
Copy link
Contributor Author

rkunnawa commented Nov 9, 2015

@deguio and @danduggan, this has been in hold for about a week now and we are requesting the dqm signature for this PR. Please let me know if you need any additional information.

Cheers
Raghav

@deguio
Copy link
Contributor

deguio commented Nov 10, 2015

ciao @rkunnawa
please submit to 80x as well.
I think the changes are fine even if the use of containers to hold monitor elements would make the code more readable and more maintainable.
in general please don't comment code. just remove the commented lines from both c++ and python.
thanks,
F.

@rkunnawa
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi @deguio, Im testing the PR for 80X at the moment with the matrix. In the meanwhile, I can remove the commented out statements to this PR and we can test this again.

@rkunnawa
Copy link
Contributor Author

@deguio, ive created a new PR for 80X with the same Jet DQM code (with removing some of the commented out code) #12353.

@deguio
Copy link
Contributor

deguio commented Nov 10, 2015

ok thanks. I triggered the tests there.

@deguio
Copy link
Contributor

deguio commented Nov 10, 2015

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_6_X IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @Degano, @smuzaffar

@davidlange6
Copy link
Contributor

I am cleaning up the 76x queue aside from things for analysis workflows. I'm closing this pull request, please make sure the PR is in 80x. Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants