Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update tracking MC validation scripts #12893

Merged
merged 40 commits into from Jan 16, 2016

Conversation

makortel
Copy link
Contributor

@makortel makortel commented Jan 8, 2016

This PR updates the tracking MC validation scripts with the main changes being

  • Include V0 validation plots
  • Update PackedCandidate plots (followup to Update tracking MiniAOD validation #12405)
  • Support plots by originalAlgo and algoMask
    • When the histograms are available, e.g. MTV in standalone and trackingOnly modes
  • Support plots for seeds and built tracks
    • When the histograms are available, e.g. MTV in trackingOnly mode
  • Support comparing DQM files with different MTV subfolder naming conventions using a predefined fallback mechanism
    • E.g. to compare 80X and 62X_SLHC DQM files
  • Include timing plots (from FastTimerService)
  • Include tables in the summary report pages
  • Tuning/additions of plots
  • Decrease (stdout) verbosity

Based on 800pre4, standard workflows are not touched so no changes expected.

@rovere @VinInn

Include support for old-style iteration naming
Produce their summaries only if they exist
Make only subset of plots for them. Support also
initialStepPreSplitting.
ConvStep timing is monitored separately.
That was implicitly the default. But in case the histograms have no
uncertainties set, ROOT defaults to HIST, and I want to have "EP"
always.
@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jan 8, 2016

A new Pull Request was created by @makortel (Matti Kortelainen) for CMSSW_8_0_X.

It involves the following packages:

Validation/RecoTrack
Validation/RecoVertex

@cmsbuild, @vanbesien, @deguio, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@GiacomoSguazzoni, @rovere, @VinInn, @cerati, @wmtford, @istaslis, @dgulhan, @venturia this is something you requested to watch as well.
@slava77, @Degano, @smuzaffar you are the release manager for this.

Following commands in first line of a comment are recognized

  • +1|approve[d]|sign[ed]: L1/L2's to approve it
  • -1|reject[ed]: L1/L2's to reject it
  • assign <category>[,<category>[,...]]: L1/L2's to request signatures from other categories
  • unassign <category>[,<category>[,...]]: L1/L2's to remove signatures from other categories
  • hold: L1/all L2's/release manager to mark it as on hold
  • unhold: L1/user who put this PR on hold
  • merge: L1/release managers to merge this request
  • [@cmsbuild,] please test: L1/L2 and selected users to start jenkins tests
  • [@cmsbuild,] please test with cms-sw/cmsdist#<PR>: L1/L2 and selected users to start jenkins tests using externals from cmsdist

@VinInn
Copy link
Contributor

VinInn commented Jan 8, 2016

@cmsbuild, please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jan 8, 2016

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/10447/console

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jan 8, 2016

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jan 8, 2016

@makortel
Copy link
Contributor Author

Could DQM (@deguio, @vanbesien) please review and sign? Thanks.

@deguio
Copy link
Contributor

deguio commented Jan 15, 2016

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_8_0_X IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @slava77, @davidlange6, @Degano, @smuzaffar

@davidlange6
Copy link
Contributor

+1

cmsbuild added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 16, 2016
Update tracking MC validation scripts
@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit 4a675cd into cms-sw:CMSSW_8_0_X Jan 16, 2016
@makortel makortel deleted the trackingValidation_v5 branch October 20, 2016 11:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants