New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Added 2-D histogram of trigger tower flags vs Et; Revert FEStatus to run based: getting LS reports from FEMap instead. #16205
Conversation
A new Pull Request was created by @tanmaymudholkar (Tanmay Mudholkar) for CMSSW_8_0_X. It involves the following packages: DQM/EcalMonitorClient @cmsbuild, @dmitrijus, @vanbesien, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here #13028 |
+1 |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_8_0_X IBs after it passes the integration tests. This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @slava77, @davidlange6, @smuzaffar |
Hi @dmitrijus , I did a cherry-pick. (started out from base 8_0_20, cherry-picked both commits in #16112 , and added my own commit on top). I'll keep an eye on this, and if there is a conflict I can make a new PR -- thanks for letting me know. |
Pull request #16205 was updated. @cmsbuild, @dmitrijus, @vanbesien, @davidlange6 can you please check and sign again. |
Just for some additional background related to the update in this PR: a rather urgent fix was implemented by ECAL DQM which needed to be patched on the deployment server. In order to avoid conflicts, in consultation with @diguida , I updated this PR. |
@tanmaymudholkar @dmitrijus to be crystal clear: the new commit 13c7189 is a cherry-pick of f306f23 included in #16304 . Given that this branch departs from 8.0.20, it can be used online. |
@tanmaymudholkar can you please update the title of the PR to be like this: Added 2-D histogram of trigger tower flags vs Et; Revert FEStatus to run based: getting LS reports from FEMap instead. and the description:
|
@diguida Thanks for the suggestion. I have updated the title and description of the PR as you requested. Sorry for the confusion! |
+1 |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_8_0_X IBs after it passes the integration tests. This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @slava77, @davidlange6, @smuzaffar |
Comparison job queued. |
+1 |
This branch departs from 8.0.20, and contains the commits already proposed in #16112 and merged in 8.0.21; there shouldn't be a conflict while merging this PR into CMSSW_8_0_X branch. The main features:
CMSSW 8_0_18
or ~run 279498).ecalRawDataClient.MEs.QualitySummary
andecalRawDataTask.MEs.FEStatus
to be run-based again.ecalRawDataTask.MEs.FEStatusErrMapByLumi
(introduced later, in PR Duplicate key MEs for by lumi reset. #16112) which, by design, is already reset every LS, and is filled independently of the affected MEs above.