New ME0GeometryBuilder for baseline ME0 geometry

[pietverwilligen]

Use the newest ME0GeometryBuilder also for the M1 geometry (it was already in use for the M2 geometry where ME0 consist of 10 eta partitions). This PR provides the most detailed description of the ME0 Geometry also for the M1 geometry with a single eta partition. This PR is needed for studies the GEM Reco&Val group will perform on (eventually reprocessed by ourself) DIGI-RECO samples.

[cmsbuild]

+1
Tested at: cf6ca03
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-17175/17283/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

Comparison job queued.

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-17175/17283/summary.html

[ianna]

+1

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_9_0_X IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @smuzaffar

[davidlange6]

+1

[slava77]

@pietverwilligen @calabria

I noticed that ME0 hits are now placed at 0 in local y instead of some not very realistic but still more practical ~flat distribution along the chamber length

If I'm not mistaken, this should mean that downstream ME0 reco is broken.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/baseLineComparisons/CMSSW_9_0_X_2017-01-13-1100+17175/17858/21234.0_TTbar_14TeV+TTbar_14TeV_TuneCUETP8M1_2023D4_GenSimHLBeamSpotFull14+DigiFull_2023D4+RecoFullGlobal_2023D4+HARVESTFullGlobal_2023D4/Muons_RecoMuonV_MultiTrack_extractMe0Muons.html

Please check and comment when should we expect a fix.

[pietverwilligen]

I provided a bugfix: PR #17250