Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

L1TGlobalProducer: fix prescale index counting #17497

Merged

Conversation

rekovic
Copy link
Contributor

@rekovic rekovic commented Feb 13, 2017

80x backport of 90x PR #17496.

The L1 prescale index should consistently count from 0 - this is the
convention used by the L1 uGT, the monitoring code (e.g. WBM), etc.

The previous version of the code was internally inconsistent: the value
m_prescaleSet-1 was being used to determine the prescales, but the
value m_prescaleSet was set in the uGT payload.

The L1 prescale index should consistently count from 0 - this is the
convention used by the L1 uGT, the monitoring code (e.g. WBM), etc.

The previous version of the code was internally inconsistent: the value
`m_prescaleSet-1` was being used to determine the prescales, but the
value `m_prescaleSet` was set in the uGT payload.
@rekovic
Copy link
Contributor Author

rekovic commented Feb 13, 2017

Please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @rekovic for CMSSW_8_0_X.

It involves the following packages:

L1Trigger/L1TGlobal

@cmsbuild, @rekovic, @mulhearn, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@Martin-Grunewald, @kreczko this is something you requested to watch as well.
@davidlange6, @smuzaffar you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here #13028

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Feb 13, 2017

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/17763/console Started: 2017/02/13 16:18

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@rekovic
Copy link
Contributor Author

rekovic commented Feb 14, 2017

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_8_0_X IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @smuzaffar

@fwyzard
Copy link
Contributor

fwyzard commented Feb 28, 2017

backport

@davidlange6
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit 852fc5e into cms-sw:CMSSW_8_0_X Apr 12, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants