Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

lower pt cut on dedxhitinfo to 10 GeV and add dedx harmonic2 for pixel hits #18773

Merged

Conversation

slava77
Copy link
Contributor

@slava77 slava77 commented May 16, 2017

Lowering of pt from 15 GeV to 10 GeV increases signal yields by 10% for short (pixel-only) heavy high pt tracks.

Addition of the pixel-only harmonic2 enables calibration from AOD (it has to be done on low pt tracks; hence full addition).

the cost to AOD is about 1% (1 kB/event from the dedxHitInfo lower threshold and 3kB/evt from the pixel-only harmonic2) based on checks in ttbar and Run2016H JetHT data. This estimate was made in 80X.

The addition of dedx estimator for pixel to AOD is directly related to https://indico.cern.ch/event/638437/contributions/2595782/attachments/1460494/2255768/stoppedtracks_xpog_170516.pdf (see minutes for it in https://indico.cern.ch/event/638437/contributions/2595782/note/)

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @slava77 (Slava Krutelyov) for master.

It involves the following packages:

RecoTracker/DeDx

@perrotta, @cmsbuild, @slava77, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@ghellwig, @makortel, @felicepantaleo, @GiacomoSguazzoni, @rovere, @VinInn, @mschrode, @gpetruc, @ebrondol, @dgulhan this is something you requested to watch as well.
@davidlange6 you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor Author

slava77 commented May 16, 2017

@cmsbuild please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.

@gpetruc
Copy link
Contributor

gpetruc commented May 16, 2017

Don't you also need to add a keep *_dedxPixelHarmonic2_*_* in https://github.com/cms-sw/cmssw/blob/master/RecoTracker/Configuration/python/RecoTracker_EventContent_cff.py#L63 ?

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #18773 was updated. @perrotta, @cmsbuild, @slava77, @davidlange6 can you please check and sign again.

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor Author

slava77 commented May 16, 2017

@cmsbuild please test

@gpetruc thanks for spotting the missing event content change, I had the change in local but not committed/pushed .. surprisingly I repeated the same in 80X as well

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented May 16, 2017

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/19886/console Started: 2017/05/16 21:24

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-18773/19886/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • ROOTFileChecks: Some differences in event products or their sizes found
  • Reco comparison results: 1679 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 24
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 1833858
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 39165
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 106
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 1794407
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 180
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • Checked 98 log files, 14 edm output root files, 24 DQM output files

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor Author

slava77 commented May 17, 2017

+1

for #18773 f190f90

  • jenkins tests pass and comparisons show differences only in DQM plots of /dedxHitInfo, corresponding to more tracks added to the plots as a result of lowering the threshold on selected tracks data to be saved
  • local tests were done as a pre-submission step and impact is provided in the PR description

wf136 731_dedx_nhits

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @smuzaffar

@davidlange6
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit bb51919 into cms-sw:master May 21, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants