temporarily disable setNoiseFlagsQIE11 for AlCa

[kpedro88]

Followup to #18821, disabling setNoiseFlagsQIE11 for AlCaRECO sequences.

[kpedro88]

please test

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @kpedro88 (Kevin Pedro) for master.

It involves the following packages:

Calibration/HcalAlCaRecoProducers

@ghellwig, @arunhep, @cerminar, @cmsbuild, @franzoni, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@ghellwig, @mmusich, @tocheng this is something you requested to watch as well.
@davidlange6 you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

[cmsbuild]

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/19991/console Started: 2017/05/19 15:37

[cmsbuild]

+1
Tested at: e097865
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-18853/19991/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

Comparison job queued.

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-18853/19991/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

• No significant changes to the logs found
• Reco comparison results: 95 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 24
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 1833901
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 32717
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 1801004
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 180
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• Checked 98 log files, 14 edm output root files, 24 DQM output files

[ghellwig]

@kpedro88 is this PR intended to be merged or not?
I see that #18855 is a backport to CMSSW_9_2_0_patchX. But since this fix anyway just temporary, I am wondering if it makes sense to merge it in master or not...

[kpedro88]

@ghellwig I think it should be merged in 92X since we're not sure when the needed parameters will become available

[ghellwig]

+1

[ghellwig]

thanks @kpedro88

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @smuzaffar

[davidlange6]

+1