Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added include for Candidate.h to TopProjectorAlgo.h #21523

Closed

Conversation

Teemperor
Copy link
Contributor

We actually require the definition of Candidate in this header,
so we include the associated header to make this header parsable
on its own.

We actually require the definition of Candidate in this header,
so we include the associated header to make this header parsable
on its own.
@Teemperor
Copy link
Contributor Author

Part of the work going on regarding the C++ modules migration of CMSSW (tracked as issue #15248). This PR is not meant to refactor things, but just to make these headers compile.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/PR-21523/2284

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @Teemperor (Raphael Isemann) for master.

It involves the following packages:

CommonTools/ParticleFlow

@perrotta, @cmsbuild, @monttj, @slava77 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@ahinzmann, @jdolen, @rappoccio, @gkasieczka, @cbernet this is something you requested to watch as well.
@davidlange6, @slava77 you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@davidlange6
Copy link
Contributor

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Nov 30, 2017

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/24785/console Started: 2017/11/30 17:47

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Dec 1, 2017

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-21523/24785/summary.html

There are some workflows for which there are errors in the baseline:
10824.0 step 5
The results for the comparisons for these workflows could be incomplete
This means most likely that the IB is having errors in the relvals.The error does NOT come from this pull request

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 26
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2606833
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 1
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2606661
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 171
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 1.14999999999 KiB( 22 files compared)
  • Checked 106 log files, 8 edm output root files, 26 DQM output files

@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@

#include "DataFormats/ParticleFlowCandidate/interface/PFCandidateFwd.h"

#include "DataFormats/Candidate/interface/Candidate.h"
#include "DataFormats/Candidate/interface/CandidateFwd.h"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

similar to #18805 and #21415 the solution should be to include the Candidate.h in CandidateFwd.h and then move CandidateFwd.h to CandidateDefs.h

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Dec 7, 2017

@Teemperor
ping
please clarify on the status of resolution of #21523 (comment)
Thank you.

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Dec 14, 2017

[a weekly reminder]
@Teemperor
ping
please clarify on the status of resolution of #21523 (comment)
Thank you.

@Teemperor Teemperor closed this Dec 19, 2017
@Teemperor Teemperor deleted the IncludeCandidatehTopprojectoralgoh branch December 19, 2017 08:47
@Teemperor Teemperor restored the IncludeCandidatehTopprojectoralgoh branch December 19, 2017 10:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants