Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix compilation warnings in gcc7 IBs #22599

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Mar 15, 2018

Conversation

mrodozov
Copy link
Contributor

PR #22560 introduced some warnings
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/cgi-bin/showBuildLogs.py/slc7_amd64_gcc700/www/tue/10.1-tue-11/CMSSW_10_1_X_2018-03-13-1100
adding virtual methods to a class with publicly accessible destructor this is fix.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@mrodozov
Copy link
Contributor Author

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Mar 13, 2018

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/26828/console Started: 2018/03/13 16:53

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @mrodozov (Mircho Rodozov) for master.

It involves the following packages:

FWCore/Framework

@cmsbuild, @smuzaffar, @Dr15Jones can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@makortel, @Martin-Grunewald, @wddgit this is something you requested to watch as well.
@davidlange6, @slava77, @fabiocos you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@Dr15Jones
Copy link
Contributor

-1
The better solution would be to declare the destructor as virtual.

@smuzaffar
Copy link
Contributor

abort test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Jenkins tests are aborted.

@mrodozov
Copy link
Contributor Author

updated

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison job queued.

@Dr15Jones
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-22599/26829/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 29
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2477528
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 1
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2477351
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 176
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 1.00999999998 KiB( 22 files compared)
  • Checked 118 log files, 9 edm output root files, 29 DQM output files

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Mar 14, 2018

From @smuzaffar: This is for slc6_amd64_gcc700. Things looks fine, there are no more warning.
-1

Tested at: f324bc3

You can see the results of the tests here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-22599/26837/summary.html

I found follow errors while testing this PR

Failed tests: RelVals

  • RelVals:

When I ran the RelVals I found an error in the following worklfows:
150.0 step3

runTheMatrix-results/150.0_HydjetQ_B12_5020GeV_2018+HydjetQ_B12_5020GeV_2018+DIGIHI2018+RECOHI2018+HARVESTHI2018/step3_HydjetQ_B12_5020GeV_2018+HydjetQ_B12_5020GeV_2018+DIGIHI2018+RECOHI2018+HARVESTHI2018.log

@smuzaffar
Copy link
Contributor

@Dr15Jones
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@fabiocos
Copy link
Contributor

@smuzaffar @Dr15Jones the crash is the AlcaBeamMonitor issue already seen on gcc7 for that workflow, it looks unrelated to this PR

@fabiocos
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit 854267e into cms-sw:master Mar 15, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants