New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[10.1.X] Fix for ALCARECOSiStripCalMinBiasTrackingDQM as discussed on PR #23498 #23528
[10.1.X] Fix for ALCARECOSiStripCalMinBiasTrackingDQM as discussed on PR #23498 #23528
Conversation
A new Pull Request was created by @mmusich (Marco Musich) for CMSSW_10_1_X. It involves the following packages: DQMOffline/CalibTracker @vazzolini, @kmaeshima, @dmitrijus, @cmsbuild, @jfernan2, @vanbesien can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here
|
please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
Comparison job queued. |
Hi @fabiocos |
Comparison is ready Comparison Summary:
|
please test workflow 4.24, 4.28, 4.74, 4.78, 134.702, 134.703, 134.912, 135.1, 136.722, 136.723, 136.726, 136.728 |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
please test workflow 4.24, 4.28, 4.74, 4.78, 134.702, 134.703, 134.912, 135.1, 136.722, 136.723, 136.726, 136.728 |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
Comparison job queued. |
Comparison is ready @slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:
Comparison Summary:
|
+1
…________________________________________
From: Luca Pernie [notifications@github.com]
Sent: 09 June 2018 09:20
To: cms-sw/cmssw
Cc: Javier Fernandez Menendez; Mention
Subject: Re: [cms-sw/cmssw] [10.1.X] Fix for ALCARECOSiStripCalMinBiasTrackingDQM as discussed on PR #23498 (#23528)
@cmsdqm<https://github.com/cmsdqm> @jfernan2<https://github.com/jfernan2> could you please sign #23523<#23523> and this PR? The tests I made are workflows affected, so there should not be problem in IB @fabiocos<https://github.com/fabiocos> .
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#23528 (comment)>, or mute the thread<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AETJ6X97D62eWwW1YltsLtD4Sl8spSiLks5t63dOgaJpZM4UgCrw>.
|
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_10_1_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_10_2_X is complete. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
@fabiocos something else is needed here? |
+1 |
backport of #23523
as a reminder this is needed, because without this change, once the MC AlCaReco TriggerBits for the
SiStripCalMinBias
ALCARECO producer are activated (as it is done e.g. in #23498) the moduleALCARECOSiStripCalMinBiasTrackingDQM
will fail with:In turn the activation of the of the Trigger Bits is needed to be able to generate a sample of
SiStripCalMinBias
events to derive the G2 calibration for the physics MC in 10.2.X.