New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Disable hcalLaserEventFilter occupancy filter #23597
Disable hcalLaserEventFilter occupancy filter #23597
Conversation
The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins. |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-23597/5201 |
A new Pull Request was created by @jkunkle for master. It involves the following packages: RecoMET/METFilters @perrotta, @monttj, @cmsbuild, @slava77, @gpetruc, @arizzi can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
To test one can run these steps
At the end you should see an output like
This is the expected output since the laser was not firing. If instead one comments out the changes here and reruns
You see a different output with most events failing the MET filter |
please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
Comparison job queued. |
Comparison is ready Comparison Summary:
|
|
||
from Configuration.Eras.Modifier_run2_HCAL_2018_cff import run2_HCAL_2018 | ||
run2_HCAL_2018.toModify( hcalLaserEventFilter, | ||
vetoByHBHEOccupancy = cms.bool( False), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please drop type specification: types were already defined, and removing it here may help catching possible mistypes
The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins. |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-23597/5266 |
please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
Comparison job queued. |
Comparison is ready Comparison Summary:
|
+1
|
+1 |
merge |
We found that the occupancy filter in the hcalLaserEventFilter is erroneously removing good events. We think that increasing the threshold to 8000 would be sufficient, but we also simply disable it in favor of the LaserMon filter. We use the eras to ensure that the settings are only updated for 2018 data.
@deguio @mariadalfonso