New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
DAQ file broker client (10_2_X) #23947
Conversation
…ile service which will distribute input files
Signed-off-by: Srecko Morovic <srecko.morovic@cern.ch>
catch file not exists and check for run directory on BU handle NORUN fix READY with no file current LS handle JSON file move by server to subdirectory with prefix
support for socket keep alive (experimental)
fix undefined variable value when no raw file use shared lock for server contact and promote it to exclusive if EoLS file(s) have to be written
…ase of deletion of the run directory
access to copy JSON file from ramdisk. This allows better diagnosis of problems (such as recently seen bad file descriptor problem in some tests). This is enabled only for File Broker, while NFS locking code remains unchanged (as it is going to be phased out).
keep alive by default close socket on error NB: in tests it turns out that read_until reads the whole response. this is however not always guaranteed and updates will be needed to read based on HTTP Content-Length
A new Pull Request was created by @smorovic (Srecko Morovic) for CMSSW_10_2_X. It involves the following packages: EventFilter/Utilities @perrotta, @mommsen, @cmsbuild, @emeschi, @slava77 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here
|
please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
Comparison job queued. |
+1 |
Comparison is ready Comparison Summary:
|
+1
|
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_10_2_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_10_3_X is complete. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
backport of #23944 |
Hi @slava77, |
+1 |
Backport of #23944 (10_3_X)
Client implementation for new DAQ File Broker protocol