New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
optimized muon validation #2409
optimized muon validation #2409
Conversation
A new Pull Request was created by @deguio for CMSSW_6_2_X_SLHC. optimized muon validation It involves the following packages: Validation/RecoMuon @ojeda, @danduggan, @rovere, @cmsbuild, @nclopezo, @deguio, @Degano can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. |
@cmsbuild F. |
This passes our validation with only the known failures. |
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_6_2_X_SLHC IBs unless changes or unless it breaks tests. @andersonjacob, @mark-grimes can you please take care of it? |
Tested on latest integration build. Extended pixel test okay. GEM test okay. All tests pass except 3400 crashing with the MonitorElement stack trace. Don't think this has anything to do with this pull request though, see the comments on #2405. Need to figure out exactly what's going on before we can proceed with this. |
merge Above error is unrelated to this pull request and has been fixed. Extended pixel test; GEM test; 3300, 3400, 4100, 4400, 40001, 50002, 60002, 4502, 4500, 5001 and 15001 all fine. |
optimized muon validation sequence.
for info: differs from #2404