New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
data processing scenarios for T0 for heavy ions data taking in 2018 #24468
data processing scenarios for T0 for heavy ions data taking in 2018 #24468
Conversation
The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins. |
@cmsbuild please test |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-24468/6313 |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
A new Pull Request was created by @slava77 (Slava Krutelyov) for master. It involves the following packages: Configuration/DataProcessing @cmsbuild, @franzoni, @fabiocos, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
Comparison job queued. |
Comparison is ready Comparison Summary:
|
+operations changes to DataProcessing for 2018 HI activities, the unit test for configuration build is passed, and a configuration can be built using these scenarios |
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will be automatically merged. |
data processing scenarios for T0 for heavy ions data taking in 2018 [bp of #24468 ]
Two scenarions were added
ppEra_Run2_2018_pp_on_AA
which corresponds to the present default processing setup based on pp-like recoHeavyIonsEra_Run2_2018
which corresponds to a possible fall-back based on HeavyIons scenarioI also cleaned up run_CfgTest.sh from the tests of 2015/2016 scenarios. There is no practical way we will go back to these.