Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[10_2_X] OfflineDQM: Offline L1T muon DQM bugfix for muon resolution plots CMSLITDPG-763 #24874

Closed

Conversation

stahlleiton
Copy link
Contributor

Backport of #24870

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 15, 2018

A new Pull Request was created by @stahlleiton (Andre Stahl) for CMSSW_10_2_X.

It involves the following packages:

DQMOffline/L1Trigger

@cmsbuild, @andrius-k, @kmaeshima, @schneiml, @nsmith-, @rekovic, @jfernan2, @thomreis can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@kreczko, @thomreis, @rociovilar this is something you requested to watch as well.
@davidlange6, @slava77, @fabiocos you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@thomreis
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 15, 2018

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/31036/console Started: 2018/10/15 16:55

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

-1

Tested at: fd35d2b

You can see the results of the tests here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-24874/31036/summary.html

I found follow errors while testing this PR

Failed tests: RelVals

  • RelVals:

When I ran the RelVals I found an error in the following worklfows:
250202.181 step5

runTheMatrix-results/250202.181_TTbar_13UP18+TTbar_13UP18+PREMIXUP18_PU25+DIGIPRMXLOCALUP18_PU25+RECOPRMXUP18_PU25+HARVESTUP18_PU25/step5_TTbar_13UP18+TTbar_13UP18+PREMIXUP18_PU25+DIGIPRMXLOCALUP18_PU25+RECOPRMXUP18_PU25+HARVESTUP18_PU25.log

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison not run due to runTheMatrix errors (RelVals and Igprof tests were also skipped)

@thomreis
Copy link
Contributor

please test

error looks unrelated to the code changes.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 15, 2018

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/31039/console Started: 2018/10/15 18:48

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-24874/31039/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 31
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2986766
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 7
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2986569
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 190
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 30 files compared)
  • Checked 129 log files, 14 edm output root files, 31 DQM output files

@andrius-k
Copy link

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_10_2_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_10_4_X is complete. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@andrius-k
Copy link

Hi @stahlleiton, as 10_2 is no longer being used maybe this PR should be closed?

@fabiocos
Copy link
Contributor

fabiocos commented Nov 6, 2018

@stahlleiton @rekovic is this PR still really needed now that 10_2_X is no more used for data taking?

@fabiocos
Copy link
Contributor

fabiocos commented Nov 6, 2018

hold

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Nov 6, 2018

Pull request has been put on hold by @fabiocos
They need to issue an unhold command to remove the hold state or L1 can unhold it for all

@fabiocos
Copy link
Contributor

@rekovic @thomreis ping

@thomreis
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @fabiocos
If no data is processed anymore with 10_2 this PR is not needed anymore. @stahlleiton please close it.

@fabiocos
Copy link
Contributor

@thomreis pp data taking is over and for HI 10_3_X is used. Of course MC production is ongoign as well as analysis, but you do not need this for those activities, right? So I would just close it.

@thomreis
Copy link
Contributor

Agreed.

@fabiocos fabiocos closed this Nov 19, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants