Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Re-adding 2016-2017 Cosmic WFs #25249

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Nov 17, 2018
Merged

Re-adding 2016-2017 Cosmic WFs #25249

merged 1 commit into from Nov 17, 2018

Conversation

boudoul
Copy link
Contributor

@boudoul boudoul commented Nov 15, 2018

This branch is re-adding the 2016-2017 Cosmic WFS - The filter is the usual one : filtering within the tracker volume, so that cosmic muons can cross the entire tracker Volume (and not only the Pixel volume like in the SP case)
For 2016 I used the previous cosmic GTs defined in autocond which I believe was the one used in MC prod at that time but kept maintained: run2_mc_cosmics , but we would need the final confirmation from @lpernie and @tocheng .

WF to be tested here : 7.21 7.22 (resp 2017, 2016)

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @boudoul (boudoul) for master.

It involves the following packages:

Configuration/PyReleaseValidation

@pgunnell, @zhenhu, @prebello, @cmsbuild, @kpedro88 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@makortel, @Martin-Grunewald this is something you requested to watch as well.
@davidlange6, @slava77, @fabiocos you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@davidlange6
Copy link
Contributor

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Nov 15, 2018

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/31679/console Started: 2018/11/15 19:10

@fabiocos
Copy link
Contributor

please test workflow 7.20,7.21,7.22

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-25249/31679/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 3 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 32
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3013311
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 20
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3013094
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 197
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 31 files compared)
  • Checked 134 log files, 14 edm output root files, 32 DQM output files

@fabiocos
Copy link
Contributor

@slava77 this addresses your request

@fabiocos
Copy link
Contributor

@lpernie @tocheng could you please confirm that the used GT here is the right one?

@lpernie
Copy link
Contributor

lpernie commented Nov 16, 2018

Hello @fabiocos , this PR is pointing to the auto:run2_mc_cosmics which points to 103X_mcRun2cosmics_startup_deco_v1 in autocond.
This v1 GT, as all other 2016 GTs, has an incorrect ECAL PF threshold tag. This TAG has been fixed in #25256

@fabiocos
Copy link
Contributor

@lpernie thank you, but apart for the problem that will be fixed by your additional PR the GT is confirmed

@fabiocos
Copy link
Contributor

@prebello @zhenhu @kpedro88 do you have objections/comments or can we move this PR forward?

@lpernie
Copy link
Contributor

lpernie commented Nov 16, 2018

Yes

@kpedro88
Copy link
Contributor

+upgrade

@prebello
Copy link
Contributor

+1

no objections.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@fabiocos
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

7 participants