New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Backport] Discard Beamspot fit results when d0-phi fit status is unknown #25320
[Backport] Discard Beamspot fit results when d0-phi fit status is unknown #25320
Conversation
A new Pull Request was created by @sarafiorendi for CMSSW_10_3_X. It involves the following packages: RecoVertex/BeamSpotProducer @perrotta, @tocheng, @cmsbuild, @franzoni, @slava77, @pohsun, @lpernie can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
Comparison job queued. |
Comparison is ready Comparison Summary:
|
type bugfix |
note that this workflow doesn't rerun the HLT..
… On Nov 23, 2018, at 10:43 AM, perrotta ***@***.***> wrote:
Is this extra accepted trigger path in RunJetHT2017FreMINIAOD wf 136p8311 depending on this fix?
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.
|
Good point, thank you @davidlange6 : then I am puzzled... |
The issue causing the non-reproducible behaviour observed here in the path monitoring was traced in #25324 as caused by some missing initialization in the HcalNoiseSummary, and the fix is proposed by @slava77 with #25325 (104X), #25326 (102X), and #25327 (103X). |
+1 |
+1
|
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_10_3_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_10_4_X is complete. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
Backport of #25319