New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
added pull_request_template.md #25848
added pull_request_template.md #25848
Conversation
The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins. |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-25848/8303
|
A new Pull Request was created by @smuzaffar (Malik Shahzad Muzaffar) for master. It involves the following packages: pull_request_template.md The following packages do not have a category, yet: pull_request_template.md @cmsbuild can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
Pull request #25848 was updated. @cmsbuild, @smuzaffar, @Dr15Jones can you please check and sign again. |
@smuzaffar the other messages printed by the bot are stored in the bot repository itself, like https://github.com/cms-sw/cms-bot/blob/master/cms_static.py |
@fabiocos , other messages are comments added by bot after the creation of PR. |
@smuzaffar ok, I see the reason, it refers to the instructions https://help.github.com/articles/creating-a-pull-request-template-for-your-repository/ So what are your integration plans? We should obviously add this file I would say to the core list in categories_map.py in cms-bot, I was about to do it today but I had this question before |
@fabiocos , @Dr15Jones feel free to update the contents of this PR. Should be add all L2's to sign this ( so that they are aware of the change)? |
@smuzaffar I would perhaps modify "code contains tests relevant for the problem you are solving" into "code if possible contains tests relevant for the problem you are solving", as this does not necessarily always applies. |
assign hlt,visualization,upgrade,generators,reconstruction,dqm,fastsim,db,alca,daq,xpog,pdmv,geometry,analysis,simulation,l1 |
New categories assigned: fastsim,visualization,upgrade,xpog,pdmv,geometry,hlt,db,analysis,alca,generators,daq,reconstruction,l1,dqm,simulation @Dr15Jones,@Dr15Jones,@andrius-k,@tocheng,@alberto-sanchez,@cvuosalo,@schneiml,@ianna,@kpedro88,@Martin-Grunewald,@jfernan2,@prebello,@zhenhu,@mommsen,@slava77,@ggovi,@perrozzi,@rekovic,@nsmith-,@efeyazgan,@pohsun,@emeschi,@qliphy,@peruzzim,@kmaeshima,@civanch,@civanch,@civanch,@alja,@pgunnell,@ssekmen,@franzoni,@perrotta,@santocch,@fgolf,@mdhildreth,@mdhildreth,@mdhildreth,@fwyzard,@lveldere you have been requested to review this Pull request/Issue and eventually sign? Thanks |
+1 |
+1 |
+1 |
+1 I plan to merge this for next IB |
+1 |
+1 |
@Dr15Jones concerning the remark you did last week: in case you have commit comments that ends into the PR description, they will come before the template text. So it will be up to the submitter to properly move them into the description section replacing the text in brackets < > , if (s)he wants to keep the template formatting. |
merge |
+1 |
Added new Pull Request template which should be presented to the pull request submitter at the time of PR creation.