Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove outdated tau code #26816

Merged
merged 12 commits into from May 23, 2019
Merged

Remove outdated tau code #26816

merged 12 commits into from May 23, 2019

Conversation

steggema
Copy link
Contributor

PR description:

This removes a lot of outdated and unused tau code, in particular the full package RecoTauTag/TauTagTools and the CaloTau reconstruction. The goal is do make tau development easier and to reduce the maintenance burden. No changes are expected in any of the workflows.

PR validation:

Matrix tests were run locally as well as the tau reconstruction sequence itself to validate that there are no unwanted effects. The changes were reviewed by the RECO contacts @mbluj @swozniewski, also to confirm that there are no customers outside of CMSSW to the best of our knowledge.

@rmanzoni @roger-wolf

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-26816/9834

  • This PR adds an extra 52KB to repository

  • Found files with invalid states:

    • RecoTauTag/RecoTau/src/PFRecoTauTagInfoAlgorithm.cc:
    • RecoTauTag/RecoTau/plugins/PFRecoTauTagInfoProducer.cc:
    • RecoTauTag/RecoTau/interface/PFRecoTauTagInfoAlgorithm.h:

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @steggema (Jan Steggemann) for master.

It involves the following packages:

CommonTools/ParticleFlow
JetMETCorrections/TauJet
L1Trigger/TrackTrigger
PhysicsTools/PatAlgos
RecoParticleFlow/Benchmark
RecoTauTag/RecoTau
RecoTauTag/TauTagTools
Utilities/ReleaseScripts

@perrotta, @smuzaffar, @Dr15Jones, @kpedro88, @cmsbuild, @rekovic, @slava77, @santocch can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@TaiSakuma, @gouskos, @schoef, @rappoccio, @sviret, @Martin-Grunewald, @peruzzim, @seemasharmafnal, @mmarionncern, @ahinzmann, @smoortga, @acaudron, @lgray, @jdolen, @drkovalskyi, @ferencek, @jdamgov, @nhanvtran, @gkasieczka, @hatakeyamak, @clelange, @HeinerTholen, @wddgit, @JyothsnaKomaragiri, @mverzett, @cbernet, @gpetruc, @mariadalfonso, @pvmulder, @bachtis this is something you requested to watch as well.
@davidlange6, @slava77, @fabiocos you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented May 17, 2019

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-run-pr-tests/295/console Started: 2019/05/17 10:56

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

-1

Tested at: 68b687c

You can see the results of the tests here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-cf1b76/295/summary.html

I found follow errors while testing this PR

Failed tests: Build HeaderConsistency

  • Build:

I found compilation error when building:

>> Compiling  /build/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/ib-run-pr-tests/CMSSW_11_0_X_2019-05-16-2300/src/RecoTauTag/RecoTau/src/RecoTauBinnedIsolationPlugin.cc 
>> Compiling  /build/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/ib-run-pr-tests/CMSSW_11_0_X_2019-05-16-2300/src/RecoTauTag/RecoTau/src/RecoTauCommonUtilities.cc 
>> Compiling  /build/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/ib-run-pr-tests/CMSSW_11_0_X_2019-05-16-2300/src/RecoTauTag/RecoTau/src/RecoTauPluginsCommon.cc 
In file included from /build/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/ib-run-pr-tests/CMSSW_11_0_X_2019-05-16-2300/src/RecoTauTag/RecoTau/interface/RecoTauBinnedIsolationPlugin.h:19:0,
                 from /build/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/ib-run-pr-tests/CMSSW_11_0_X_2019-05-16-2300/src/RecoTauTag/RecoTau/src/RecoTauBinnedIsolationPlugin.cc:1:
/build/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/ib-run-pr-tests/CMSSW_11_0_X_2019-05-16-2300/poison/RecoTauTag/RecoTau/interface/RecoTauDiscriminantPlugins.h:1:2: error: #error THIS FILE HAS BEEN REMOVED FROM THE PACKAGE.
 #error THIS FILE HAS BEEN REMOVED FROM THE PACKAGE.
  ^~~~~
In file included from /build/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/ib-run-pr-tests/CMSSW_11_0_X_2019-05-16-2300/src/RecoTauTag/RecoTau/src/RecoTauBinnedIsolationPlugin.cc:1:0:
/build/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/ib-run-pr-tests/CMSSW_11_0_X_2019-05-16-2300/src/RecoTauTag/RecoTau/interface/RecoTauBinnedIsolationPlugin.h:24:79: error: expected class-name before '{' token
 class RecoTauDiscriminationBinnedIsolation : public RecoTauDiscriminantPlugin {


@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented May 21, 2019

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-run-pr-tests/365/console Started: 2019/05/21 10:41

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-cf1b76/365/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 4 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 33
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3206828
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 2
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3206492
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 334
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 32 files compared)
  • Checked 137 log files, 14 edm output root files, 33 DQM output files

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented May 21, 2019

+1

for #26816 ccfac0e

  • code changes are in line with the PR description and the follow up review.
    • This is a technical PR (no physics results in production setup is affected)
  • jenkins tests pass and comparisons with the baseline show no differences

@kpedro88
Copy link
Contributor

+upgrade

@santocch
Copy link

+1

@fabiocos
Copy link
Contributor

@rekovic the change for l1 is trivial and just in 1 file
@Dr15Jones @smuzaffar for core this just remove the package from the Utilities list

@smuzaffar
Copy link
Contributor

+core

@fabiocos
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@rekovic the L1 part looks pretty minimal, please check and comment in case, I move forward with the integration

@fabiocos
Copy link
Contributor

merge

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

8 participants