Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[RECO] Fixes needed for new root cxxmodules #26883

Merged
merged 2 commits into from May 24, 2019
Merged

[RECO] Fixes needed for new root cxxmodules #26883

merged 2 commits into from May 24, 2019

Conversation

smuzaffar
Copy link
Contributor

@smuzaffar smuzaffar commented May 22, 2019

  • Added missing dependency
>grep -R DataFormats/SiStripDigi DataFormats/SiStripCluster
DataFormats/SiStripCluster/interface/SiStripCluster.h:#include "DataFormats/SiStripDigi/interface/SiStripDigi.h"

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@smuzaffar smuzaffar changed the title [CXXModule][RECO] Fixes needed for new root cxxmodules [RECO] Fixes needed for new root cxxmodules May 22, 2019
@smuzaffar
Copy link
Contributor Author

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-26883/9916

  • This PR adds an extra 16KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented May 22, 2019

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-run-pr-tests/414/console Started: 2019/05/22 12:06

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @smuzaffar (Malik Shahzad Muzaffar) for master.

It involves the following packages:

DataFormats/Math
DataFormats/SiStripCluster

@perrotta, @cmsbuild, @slava77 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@echabert, @makortel, @felicepantaleo, @pieterdavid, @rovere, @VinInn, @alesaggio, @mmusich, @threus this is something you requested to watch as well.
@davidlange6, @slava77, @fabiocos you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@@ -3,6 +3,8 @@
#define SMATRIX_USE_CONSTEXPR
#include <Math/SVector.h>
#include <Math/SMatrix.h>
#include <Math/MinimTransformVariable.h>
#include <TGraphDelaunay2D.h>
Copy link
Contributor Author

@smuzaffar smuzaffar May 22, 2019

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@slava77 , these can be avoided if we replace the ROOT::Math::* pattern.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

do you mean the patterns used in DataFormats/Math/src/classes_def.xml ?
There was some cleanup of dictionaries by the core team a while back to drop the wildcards.
Can that be revived/completed?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yes the pattern in DataFormats/Math/src/classes_def.xml . I am testing the following right now.

-  <class pattern="std::vector<ROOT::Math::*>" />
+  <class pattern="std::vector<ROOT::Math::SMatrix<*>>" />
+  <class pattern="std::vector<ROOT::Math::MatRepStd<*>>" />
+  <class pattern="std::vector<ROOT::Math::RowOffsets<*>>" />
+  <class pattern="std::vector<ROOT::Math::SVector<*>>" />

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@smuzaffar
Copy link
Contributor Author

@slava77 , @perrotta I updated the PR and replace the usage of pattern ROOT::Math::* in classes_def.xml

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented May 22, 2019

@cmsbuild please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented May 22, 2019

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-run-pr-tests/426/console Started: 2019/05/22 17:17

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-e5cddd/414/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 33
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3209204
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 1
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3208869
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 334
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 32 files compared)
  • Checked 137 log files, 14 edm output root files, 33 DQM output files

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-e5cddd/426/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 33
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3206828
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 1
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3206493
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 334
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 32 files compared)
  • Checked 137 log files, 14 edm output root files, 33 DQM output files

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented May 23, 2019

+1

for #26883 c9711ac

  • technical
  • jenkins tests pass

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@fabiocos
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented May 25, 2019

ah, so , in #26883 (comment)

Additional comment: 'Compilation

was actually meant to sound a significant alarm. I did not notice it.
I'll try to pay more attention to the summaries.
Although perhaps a bit more verbose message would be better.

@smuzaffar
Copy link
Contributor Author

It was meant to say "Compilation Warnings: Yes" which should have also added the "warning" label but due to bug in new pr build script it did not post the full message. I will fix this soon.

@fabiocos
Copy link
Contributor

@smuzaffar @slava77 unfortunately I missed it as well...

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants