New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[RECO] Fixes needed for new root cxxmodules #26883
Conversation
The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins. |
please test |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-26883/9916
|
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
A new Pull Request was created by @smuzaffar (Malik Shahzad Muzaffar) for master. It involves the following packages: DataFormats/Math @perrotta, @cmsbuild, @slava77 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
DataFormats/Math/src/classes.h
Outdated
@@ -3,6 +3,8 @@ | |||
#define SMATRIX_USE_CONSTEXPR | |||
#include <Math/SVector.h> | |||
#include <Math/SMatrix.h> | |||
#include <Math/MinimTransformVariable.h> | |||
#include <TGraphDelaunay2D.h> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@slava77 , these can be avoided if we replace the ROOT::Math::*
pattern.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
do you mean the patterns used in DataFormats/Math/src/classes_def.xml
?
There was some cleanup of dictionaries by the core team a while back to drop the wildcards.
Can that be revived/completed?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yes the pattern in DataFormats/Math/src/classes_def.xml
. I am testing the following right now.
- <class pattern="std::vector<ROOT::Math::*>" />
+ <class pattern="std::vector<ROOT::Math::SMatrix<*>>" />
+ <class pattern="std::vector<ROOT::Math::MatRepStd<*>>" />
+ <class pattern="std::vector<ROOT::Math::RowOffsets<*>>" />
+ <class pattern="std::vector<ROOT::Math::SVector<*>>" />
Comparison job queued. |
The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins. |
@cmsbuild please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
Comparison is ready Comparison Summary:
|
+1 |
Comparison job queued. |
Comparison is ready Comparison Summary:
|
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
ah, so , in #26883 (comment)
was actually meant to sound a significant alarm. I did not notice it. |
It was meant to say "Compilation Warnings: Yes" which should have also added the "warning" label but due to bug in new pr build script it did not post the full message. I will fix this soon. |
@smuzaffar @slava77 unfortunately I missed it as well... |
ROOT::Math::*
fromcmssw/DataFormats/Math/src/classes_def.xml
Line 7 in c52e281