Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Modernize ESProducers in CalibTracker/SiPixelESProducers #27042

Merged

Conversation

makortel
Copy link
Contributor

@makortel makortel commented May 31, 2019

PR description:

This PR modernizes the ESProducers in CalibTracker/SiPixelESProducers (as part of #26748) by

PR validation:

Code compiles, no changes expected.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-27042/10123

  • This PR adds an extra 20KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @makortel (Matti Kortelainen) for master.

It involves the following packages:

CalibTracker/SiPixelESProducers

@christopheralanwest, @tocheng, @cmsbuild, @franzoni, @tlampen, @pohsun can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@mmusich, @dkotlins, @tocheng this is something you requested to watch as well.
@davidlange6, @slava77, @fabiocos you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@makortel
Copy link
Contributor Author

@cmsbuild, please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented May 31, 2019

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-run-pr-tests/668/console Started: 2019/05/31 21:33

}
};
throwIfNotFound("SiPixelDetVOffRcd");
throwIfNotFound("SiPixelQualityFromDbRcd");
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'll be happy to remove these checks if someone could confirm that the ListOfRecordToMerge parameter indeed has no real purpose (anymore?).

@tsusa @mmusich

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@makortel Sorry for a slow response. The ListOfRecordToMerge parameter has no real purpose anymore [for SiPixelDetVOffRcd the dummy payload is used].

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @tsusa. I created #27087 to remove these checks and the parameter from the cfi file.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@makortel tnx!

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

-1

Tested at: 14f895c

You can see the results of the tests here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-981764/668/summary.html

I found follow errors while testing this PR

Failed tests: ClangBuild

  • Clang:

I found compilation warning while trying to compile with clang. Command used:

USER_CUDA_FLAGS='--expt-relaxed-constexpr' USER_CXXFLAGS='-Wno-register -fsyntax-only' scram build -k -j 64 COMPILER='llvm compile'

See details on the summary page.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison not run due to Build errors/Fireworks only changes/No short matrix requested (RelVals and Igprof tests were also skipped)

@pohsun
Copy link

pohsun commented Jun 1, 2019

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jun 1, 2019

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-run-pr-tests/686/console Started: 2019/06/01 12:07

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jun 1, 2019

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jun 1, 2019

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jun 1, 2019

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-981764/686/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 2 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 33
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3210678
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 2
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3210342
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 334
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 32 files compared)
  • Checked 137 log files, 14 edm output root files, 33 DQM output files

@pohsun
Copy link

pohsun commented Jun 1, 2019

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jun 1, 2019

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@fabiocos
Copy link
Contributor

fabiocos commented Jun 3, 2019

+1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants