New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Extend and fix RecHitTools #27128
Extend and fix RecHitTools #27128
Conversation
The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins. |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-27128/10257
|
A new Pull Request was created by @clelange (Clemens Lange) for master. It involves the following packages: RecoLocalCalo/HGCalRecAlgos @perrotta, @cmsbuild, @kpedro88, @slava77 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
-1 Tested at: c10b31a You can see the results of the tests here: I found follow errors while testing this PR Failed tests: RelVals
When I ran the RelVals I found an error in the following workflows: runTheMatrix-results/27434.0_TTbar_14TeV+TTbar_14TeV_TuneCUETP8M1_2023D35_GenSimHLBeamSpotFull14+DigiFullTrigger_2023D35+RecoFullGlobal_2023D35+HARVESTFullGlobal_2023D35/step3_TTbar_14TeV+TTbar_14TeV_TuneCUETP8M1_2023D35_GenSimHLBeamSpotFull14+DigiFullTrigger_2023D35+RecoFullGlobal_2023D35+HARVESTFullGlobal_2023D35.log29034.0 step3 runTheMatrix-results/29034.0_TTbar_14TeV+TTbar_14TeV_TuneCUETP8M1_2023D41_GenSimHLBeamSpotFull14+DigiFullTrigger_2023D41+RecoFullGlobal_2023D41+HARVESTFullGlobal_2023D41/step3_TTbar_14TeV+TTbar_14TeV_TuneCUETP8M1_2023D41_GenSimHLBeamSpotFull14+DigiFullTrigger_2023D41+RecoFullGlobal_2023D41+HARVESTFullGlobal_2023D41.log |
Comparison not run due to runTheMatrix errors (RelVals and Igprof tests were also skipped) |
OK, that's somewhat expected given the layer numbers I gave above. I'll run those workflows myself to figure out why exactly they fail.
|
please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
Comparison job queued. |
Comparison is ready Comparison Summary:
|
+1
|
@kpedro88 please have a look |
+upgrade |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
Now that all the mandatory signatures are there, it would be nice integrating this asap, so that #27160 could be rebased for the last time, hopefully, and quickly reviewed and integrated itself. |
+1 |
PR description:
This PR introduces some important functionality and fixes in/to the RecHitTools required to eventually remove magic numbers in other places of the HGCal reconstruction code.
Related to #26225
PR validation:
Ran some test code with D41 geometry and got the following output:
There are some discrepancies that need to be understood, which, however, seem to be in the geometry, underlining the importance of this PR for geometry validation.
For example: D41 should have 50 HGCal layers only, 22 FH layers, 14 BH layers.
After talking to @bsunanda , the error might also be in my setup and there are no issues in D41 geoemtry. We will investigate, but that's independent of the PR.