Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revert "Add some reset calls to TrackingMonitorClient." #27237

Conversation

schneiml
Copy link
Contributor

This reverts commit a0c43f3.

PR description:

@mmusich suspects that this is causing too many plots to be reset. So let's try without it.
This might cause double counting in other places, lets see.

PR validation:

none.

if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR:

Needs forward port if tests agree.

@schneiml
Copy link
Contributor Author

please test

@cmsbuild cmsbuild added this to the CMSSW_10_6_X milestone Jun 18, 2019
@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jun 18, 2019

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-run-pr-tests/1009/console Started: 2019/06/18 17:52

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @schneiml (Marcel Schneider) for CMSSW_10_6_X.

It involves the following packages:

DQM/TrackingMonitorClient

@andrius-k, @kmaeshima, @schneiml, @cmsbuild, @jfernan2, @fioriNTU can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@hdelanno, @makortel, @mtosi, @fioriNTU, @jandrea, @idebruyn, @threus this is something you requested to watch as well.
@davidlange6, @slava77, @fabiocos you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor

mmusich commented Jun 18, 2019

thanks @schneiml but is not only me to have this suspicion .
We are running some other tests without the lines and see what happens.
Let me add @jandrea @hbecerri and @arossi83

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor

mmusich commented Jun 18, 2019

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor

mmusich commented Jun 18, 2019

@schneiml is there a master PR as well?

@schneiml
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mmusich no master PR for now, we'll need to decide if we go with this or #27239 based on the test results. I hope the PR tests actually do something useful on these plots.

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor

mmusich commented Jun 18, 2019

@schneiml I am sorry, but I don't follow how you actually validate the improvement. You won't see it in standard relval tests.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-63d045/1009/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 4 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 33
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3208236
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 198
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3207704
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 334
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 32 files compared)
  • Checked 137 log files, 14 edm output root files, 33 DQM output files

@schneiml
Copy link
Contributor Author

http://tinyurl.com/y2m5mbxb shows the original, filled state. Since #27239 does the same but more cleanly, let's go with that.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants