Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add workflows for 2023 and 2024. Replace 13TeV 2021 by 14TeV. #27433

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jul 30, 2019

Conversation

zhenhu
Copy link
Contributor

@zhenhu zhenhu commented Jul 3, 2019

PR description:

Add new workflows for run3 2023 and 2024 scenarios.
Replace the 13TeV 2021 workflows by 14TeV.
This PR should be merged with the AlCa PR at the same time: https://github.com/cms-sw/cmssw/compare/CMSSW_11_0_X...christopheralanwest:alca-gt-2023-2024?expand=1

PR validation:

Local validation done

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jul 3, 2019

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jul 3, 2019

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-27433/10736

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jul 3, 2019

A new Pull Request was created by @zhenhu (Zhen Hu) for master.

It involves the following packages:

Configuration/PyReleaseValidation

@pgunnell, @zhenhu, @prebello, @cmsbuild, @kpedro88 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@makortel, @Martin-Grunewald this is something you requested to watch as well.
@davidlange6, @slava77, @fabiocos you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@kpedro88
Copy link
Contributor

kpedro88 commented Jul 3, 2019

@zhenhu what is 2024? I was under the impression Run3 would end after 2023...


upgradeProperties[2017]['2024PU'] = deepcopy(upgradeProperties[2017]['2024'])
upgradeProperties[2017]['2024PU']['ScenToRun'] = ['GenSimFull','DigiFullPU','RecoFullPU','HARVESTFullPU','NanoFull']

upgradeProperties[2023] = {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Will the Run 4 workflows be renamed at some point? Now there would be workflows with "2023" in their names for Run 3 and Run 4.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, this will be done as part of #26938. Maybe it's better to hold this until I can implement all the cleanup there.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@kpedro88 @makortel Nominally Run 3 will end after 2023 but there are studies underway to investigate detector performance if Run 3 is extended by one year. The "2023" and "2024" scenarios correspond to simulation of the CMS detector after integrated luminosities of 450 fb-1 and 550 fb-1 respectively. See slide 18 of the PPD update at CMS Week

From the AlCa perspective, we would like to introduce 11_0_X queues for the 450 fb-1 and 550 fb-1 scenarios so that we can integrate new developments for these queues while closing the 10_6_X mcRun3_2023 and mcRun3_2024 queues to anything other than bug fixes. At the same time, we would like to rename all of the Run 3 and later GTs to standardize the naming. The year would be left off the name of the "mcRun4" scenario until a need to distinguish between the various years arises. This is the content of the autoCond update that @zhenhu referenced at the introduction to this PR.

@kpedro88, would the autoCond update by itself conflict with your goals in #26938?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Currently the autoCond key used in the Phase 2 workflows is auto:phase2_realistic. If this key is preserved (even if the value changes), it should not interfere with the upcoming Phase 2 cleanup.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@kpedro88 I think we need to agree on a global strategy before integrating bits and pieces that contradict each other

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would prefer to submit the phase 2 cleanup before this, as it has been delayed for several weeks now by other conflicting developments. Today is a holiday in the US, but I might be able to prepare it tomorrow.

'2023' : {
'Geom' : 'DB:Extended',
'GT' : 'auto:phase1_2023_realistic',
'HLTmenu': '@relval2017',
Copy link
Contributor

@mmusich mmusich Jul 4, 2019

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @zhenhu I have a question. Is there a particular reason to have a fake menu in these relvals? I see that recently a new tag @relval2021 pointing to a real menu has been made available in #27331

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@zhenhu @mmusich indeed the idea is to use the new menu for Run3 as proposed by @Martin-Grunewald in #27331 for already existing workflows

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jul 4, 2019

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
Tested with other pull request(s) #27441
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-run-pr-tests/1327/console Started: 2019/07/04 16:31

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jul 4, 2019

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jul 4, 2019

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jul 4, 2019

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-bdfb5d/1327/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 849 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 33
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3160399
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 962
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3159103
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 334
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 32 files compared)
  • Checked 137 log files, 14 edm output root files, 33 DQM output files

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jul 5, 2019

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
Tested with other pull request(s) #27441
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-run-pr-tests/1339/console Started: 2019/07/05 15:20

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #27433 was updated. @pgunnell, @zhenhu, @prebello, @cmsbuild, @kpedro88 can you please check and sign again.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-60de47/1677/summary.html

@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:

  • /build/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/results/JR-comparison/PR-60de47/11634.0_TTbar_14TeV+TTbar_14TeV_TuneCUETP8M1_2021_GenSimFull+DigiFull_2021+RecoFull_2021+HARVESTFull_2021+ALCAFull_2021
  • /build/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/results/JR-comparison/PR-60de47/11834.0_TTbar_14TeV+TTbar_14TeV_TuneCUETP8M1_2021PU_GenSimFull+DigiFullPU_2021PU+RecoFullPU_2021PU+HARVESTFullPU_2021PU+NanoFull_2021PU
  • /build/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/results/JR-comparison/PR-60de47/12434.0_TTbar_14TeV+TTbar_14TeV_TuneCUETP8M1_2023_GenSimFull+DigiFull_2023+RecoFull_2023+HARVESTFull_2023+ALCAFull_2023
  • /build/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/results/JR-comparison/PR-60de47/12634.0_TTbar_14TeV+TTbar_14TeV_TuneCUETP8M1_2023PU_GenSimFull+DigiFullPU_2023PU+RecoFullPU_2023PU+HARVESTFullPU_2023PU+NanoFull_2023PU
  • /build/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/results/JR-comparison/PR-60de47/12834.0_TTbar_14TeV+TTbar_14TeV_TuneCUETP8M1_2024_GenSimFull+DigiFull_2024+RecoFull_2024+HARVESTFull_2024+ALCAFull_2024
  • /build/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/results/JR-comparison/PR-60de47/13034.0_TTbar_14TeV+TTbar_14TeV_TuneCUETP8M1_2024PU_GenSimFull+DigiFullPU_2024PU+RecoFullPU_2024PU+HARVESTFullPU_2024PU+NanoFull_2024PU

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 31
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2405061
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 1
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2404755
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 305
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 30 files compared)
  • Checked 128 log files, 14 edm output root files, 31 DQM output files

@zhenhu
Copy link
Contributor Author

zhenhu commented Jul 30, 2019

+1

@kpedro88
Copy link
Contributor

unhold

@kpedro88
Copy link
Contributor

+upgrade

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@kpedro88
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Aug 3, 2019

@zhenhu
please edit the PR title to reflect that 2021 13TeV was replaced by 14TeV.
Thank you.

@zhenhu zhenhu changed the title add workflows for 2023 and 2024 scenarios Add workflows for 2023 and 2024. Replace 13TeV 2021 by 14TeV. Aug 4, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants