Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Removed unnecessary beginJob/endJob methods #2754

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Mar 8, 2014

Conversation

Dr15Jones
Copy link
Contributor

In order to facilitate possible conversion of the modules to stream based
modules, we must remove the beginJob/endJob methods (since they are
not supported by the default stream implementation). This commit removed
empty/unnecessary beginJob/endJob methods. In the cases where the methods
were being used, they were left alone but the 'override' declaration was
added to ensure that if the module were converted to a stream module the
compiler could catch the fact that beginJob/endJob are not defined in the
new base class.

In order to facilitate possible conversion of the modules to stream based
modules, we must remove the beginJob/endJob methods (since they are
not supported by the default stream implementation). This commit removed
empty/unnecessary beginJob/endJob methods. In the cases where the methods
were being used, they were left alone but the 'override' declaration was
added to ensure that if the module were converted to a stream module the
compiler could catch the fact that beginJob/endJob are not defined in the
new base class.
@Dr15Jones
Copy link
Contributor Author

@ktf As this is purely a minor technical chance, I ask that it bypass signatures assuming it doesn't impede any inprogress pull requests.
I compiled this using CMSSW_7_1_X_2014-03-06-1400

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Mar 6, 2014

A new Pull Request was created by @Dr15Jones (Chris Jones) for CMSSW_7_1_X.

Removed unnecessary beginJob/endJob methods

It involves the following packages:

CommonTools/ParticleFlow
DPGAnalysis/SiStripTools
EventFilter/L1GlobalTriggerRawToDigi
EventFilter/SiPixelRawToDigi
L1Trigger/L1ExtraFromDigis
PhysicsTools/JetMCAlgos
RecoEcal/EgammaClusterProducers
RecoJets/JetAssociationProducers
RecoJets/JetPlusTracks
RecoJets/JetProducers
RecoLocalCalo/Castor
RecoLocalCalo/HcalRecProducers
RecoLocalTracker/SiPixelClusterizer
RecoLocalTracker/SiPixelRecHits
RecoLocalTracker/SubCollectionProducers
RecoMET/METProducers
RecoParticleFlow/PFTracking
RecoTracker/DeDx
RecoVertex/V0Producer
SimGeneral/TrackingAnalysis
Validation/RecoTau

@civanch, @ojeda, @danduggan, @mdhildreth, @monttj, @cmsbuild, @anton-a, @thspeer, @rovere, @deguio, @slava77, @vadler, @Degano, @mulhearn, @nclopezo can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@ghellwig, @TaiSakuma, @yslai, @GiacomoSguazzoni, @rovere, @argiro, @gpetruc, @nhanvtran, @ferencek, @cerati, @pvmulder, @venturia this is something you requested to watch as well.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
@nclopezo, @ktf you are the release manager for this.
You can merge this pull request by typing 'merge' in the first line of your comment.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Mar 7, 2014

@Dr15Jones
Copy link
Contributor Author

@davidlange6 Possible candidate for signature bypass?

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Mar 7, 2014

+1

for #2754 2eab258
jenkins said it's ok

@deguio
Copy link
Contributor

deguio commented Mar 7, 2014

+1

@mulhearn
Copy link
Contributor

mulhearn commented Mar 7, 2014

+1

@ktf
Copy link
Contributor

ktf commented Mar 8, 2014

Bypassing this. @mdhildreth @civanch @vadler @monttj complain if not ok.

ktf added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 8, 2014
Multithreading framework -- Removed unnecessary beginJob/endJob methods
@ktf ktf merged commit b97340d into cms-sw:CMSSW_7_1_X Mar 8, 2014
@nclopezo nclopezo modified the milestones: CMSSW_7_1_0_pre5, CMSSW_7_1_0_pre4 Mar 10, 2014
@Dr15Jones Dr15Jones deleted the removeEmptyBeginEndJob branch March 17, 2014 20:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

7 participants